Monster Hunter Wilds

Monster Hunter Wilds

View Stats:
I CANNOT believe this.
Before we talk, my RIG:

NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti (11GB VRAM/ FTW 3 from EVGA)
Intel Core i7-8700k (3,7 GHz)
32 GB RAM
Display: WQHD 144 Hz

The Game is installed on SSD. BUT

WTF is this. I get it. I do not meet the minimum Requirements. But this is an old school High end RIG. I still play modern Games like Space Marine 2 for example on decent Mid Range Settings with consistent 60-80 FPS. MH World for example runs with consistent 60 FPS with all Settings on Max. So i figured, that if i turn the Graphics Down in this one, it will work fine.

WRONG. The thing is: Nevermind if i play with Highest or Lowest Settings. I get around 20-30 FPS. Changing the Graphics has no impact whatsoever on my Framerate.

Now i wonder what i am doing wrong. Or is this the game and i should wait for an update?

TY in advance.
< >
Showing 16-30 of 43 comments
Steve Mar 2 @ 12:57am 
Originally posted by Meow~:
lol, even if you meet the requirements, you're not gonna have a good time trying to get a decent performance out of this unoptimised mess.

This. I have a 9800X3d with a 7900xtx and it still runs like ♥♥♥♥. However, thanks to my rig, I am able to get stable fps, but do have bad dips. I actually had to use *shudders* frame gen to smooth my curve out. Hi-res texture pack and only using 9gbs of my 24gbs VRAM and still runs like garbage on pure rasterisation. No RT.
Ambry Mar 2 @ 12:59am 
Originally posted by Müslimann:
Before we talk, my RIG:

NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti (11GB VRAM/ FTW 3 from EVGA)
Intel Core i7-8700k (3,7 GHz)
32 GB RAM
Display: WQHD 144 Hz

The Game is installed on SSD. BUT

WTF is this. I get it. I do not meet the minimum Requirements. But this is an old school High end RIG. I still play modern Games like Space Marine 2 for example on decent Mid Range Settings with consistent 60-80 FPS. MH World for example runs with consistent 60 FPS with all Settings on Max. So i figured, that if i turn the Graphics Down in this one, it will work fine.

WRONG. The thing is: Nevermind if i play with Highest or Lowest Settings. I get around 20-30 FPS. Changing the Graphics has no impact whatsoever on my Framerate.

Now i wonder what i am doing wrong. Or is this the game and i should wait for an update?

TY in advance.

Don't come to the Steam forums of a newly released popular game for any kind of serious question/advice/discussion. All the people telling you your rig is the problem are either kids or trolls (90% of people in such forums).

The game's optimization is non-existent. Even high-end rigs struggle. You're right that lowering settings makes the game look exponentially worse while barely uplifting performance, multiple people have confirmed that.

My friend runs the game on an R5 3600 and an RTX 2060. It runs poorly, but he can get somewhere between 50 and 60 fps at 1440p, low/medium settings, with FSR Balanced.

The 1080 ti is literally more powerful than a 2060, so you should be fine to at least get "playable" framerates. The CPU might bottleneck you in some instances though.

If the game was properly optimized, your rig should be able to run this game at comfortable settings and framerate, no problem. Unfortunately, it is not. It looks worse than MH:World, a game released 7 years ago, while performing disproportionately worse. Just yet another 2024/2025 release where lazy devs forgo optimization and use upscaling and framegen as a crutch instead.

EDIT : more reasonable posts than I expected in this thread. I actually had only read the first couple of replies and expected the rest to the the usual spam of trolls telling you your rig sucks / you're poor / etc. so I had skipped them.
Last edited by Ambry; Mar 2 @ 1:07am
Originally posted by Ambry:
Originally posted by Müslimann:
Before we talk, my RIG:

NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti (11GB VRAM/ FTW 3 from EVGA)
Intel Core i7-8700k (3,7 GHz)
32 GB RAM
Display: WQHD 144 Hz

The Game is installed on SSD. BUT

WTF is this. I get it. I do not meet the minimum Requirements. But this is an old school High end RIG. I still play modern Games like Space Marine 2 for example on decent Mid Range Settings with consistent 60-80 FPS. MH World for example runs with consistent 60 FPS with all Settings on Max. So i figured, that if i turn the Graphics Down in this one, it will work fine.

WRONG. The thing is: Nevermind if i play with Highest or Lowest Settings. I get around 20-30 FPS. Changing the Graphics has no impact whatsoever on my Framerate.

Now i wonder what i am doing wrong. Or is this the game and i should wait for an update?

TY in advance.

Don't come to the Steam forums of a newly released popular game for any kind of serious question/advice/discussion. All the people telling you your rig is the problem are either kids or trolls (90% of people in such forums).

The game's optimization is non-existent. Even high-end rigs struggle. You're right that lowering settings makes the game look exponentially worse while barely uplifting performance, multiple people have confirmed that.

My friend runs the game on an R5 3600 and an RTX 2060. It runs poorly, but he can get somewhere between 50 and 60 fps at 1440p, low/medium settings, with FSR Balanced.

The 1080 ti is literally more powerful than a 2060, so you should be fine to at least get "playable" framerates. The CPU might bottleneck you in some instances though.

If the game was properly optimized, your rig should be able to run this game at comfortable settings and framerate, no problem. Unfortunately, it is not. It looks worse than MH:World, a game released 7 years ago, while performing disproportionately worse. Just yet another 2024/2025 release where lazy devs forgo optimization and use upscaling and framegen as a crutch instead.

EDIT : more reasonable posts than I expected in this thread. I actually had only read the first couple of replies and expected the rest to the the usual spam of trolls telling you your rig sucks / you're poor / etc. so I had skipped them.


ok bcs i do not understand the market. I did Upgrade from a Radeon HD 6800 to 1080 Ti back in time. It was such a massive boost, that it was worth the 800 € back then. I figured, that when i wait a few years and upgrade from a 1080 ti to lets say a 4060 for around 300 € it would again be a massive boost in performance for cheap cash. But it appears that in Benchmarks the 1080 ti in raw power is somewhat stronger. The newer cards just seem to have the technological edge with new performance enhancing techs. But to see nearly 8 years later, that a 4080 is "4k Ready" is such a disappointment. That was THE EXAKT SAME Marketing they did with my 1080TI back then. But nobody seems to acknowledge this.
Originally posted by Ohen:
listen. this game is unoptimized as heck. even muta says it runs like crap https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=H4qliErPi14

what's worse. there's typos in the config file and after fixing those. my performance and graphics looked better. don't listen to the "but it runs fine for me" people. brute forcing high fps does not mean a game runs well. this game shouldn't be this heavy. it looks worse then world
That's an alleged fix. Nothing concrete about it.
Nin Mar 2 @ 2:13am 
Originally posted by Müslimann:
Before we talk, my RIG:

NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti (11GB VRAM/ FTW 3 from EVGA)
Intel Core i7-8700k (3,7 GHz)
32 GB RAM
Display: WQHD 144 Hz

The Game is installed on SSD. BUT

WTF is this. I get it. I do not meet the minimum Requirements. But this is an old school High end RIG. I still play modern Games like Space Marine 2 for example on decent Mid Range Settings with consistent 60-80 FPS. MH World for example runs with consistent 60 FPS with all Settings on Max. So i figured, that if i turn the Graphics Down in this one, it will work fine.

WRONG. The thing is: Nevermind if i play with Highest or Lowest Settings. I get around 20-30 FPS. Changing the Graphics has no impact whatsoever on my Framerate.

Now i wonder what i am doing wrong. Or is this the game and i should wait for an update?

TY in advance.

seems pretty self explanatory; you said it in the first sentence.. "you do not meet the minimum requirements"
Originally posted by Nin:
Originally posted by Müslimann:
Before we talk, my RIG:

NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti (11GB VRAM/ FTW 3 from EVGA)
Intel Core i7-8700k (3,7 GHz)
32 GB RAM
Display: WQHD 144 Hz

The Game is installed on SSD. BUT

WTF is this. I get it. I do not meet the minimum Requirements. But this is an old school High end RIG. I still play modern Games like Space Marine 2 for example on decent Mid Range Settings with consistent 60-80 FPS. MH World for example runs with consistent 60 FPS with all Settings on Max. So i figured, that if i turn the Graphics Down in this one, it will work fine.

WRONG. The thing is: Nevermind if i play with Highest or Lowest Settings. I get around 20-30 FPS. Changing the Graphics has no impact whatsoever on my Framerate.

Now i wonder what i am doing wrong. Or is this the game and i should wait for an update?

TY in advance.

seems pretty self explanatory; you said it in the first sentence.. "you do not meet the minimum requirements"

ye, but its about the comparison to other state of the art games like Space Marine 2 where i also do not meet the minimum requirements, but can play it nonetheless and in good quality and NATIVE WQHD
Frostea Mar 2 @ 4:27am 
The game has optimization issues. But surely you don’t expect that ancient relic you dug out of the tombs of Egypt to run the game properly anyway.
Even if you met the recommended requirements the graphics are still ♥♥♥♥. The blurriness are very noticeable and there are occasional crashes. This really is a broken game that was released too early.

EDIT: I suggest that you refund the game and wait for sale if you can.
Last edited by Noobmaster69; Mar 2 @ 4:49am
Ambry Mar 3 @ 12:23am 
Originally posted by Nin:
seems pretty self explanatory; you said it in the first sentence.. "you do not meet the minimum requirements"

Except he not only surpasses the minimum requirements, but also the recommended ones. The recommended GPU is a 2060. The 1080 ti is faster than that.
Zapp Mar 3 @ 12:27am 
It's the game, and you're probably wasting your time waiting for a fix.
Last edited by Zapp; Mar 3 @ 12:27am
Nero Mar 3 @ 12:31am 
"Oldschool High-End"
Tyvern Mar 3 @ 12:35am 
Let me tell you this. The game's poorly optimized and the graphics are awful to look at.
Evensong Mar 3 @ 12:40am 
Casually just trying to play one of the most demanding games to come out so far on a decade old gpu lol.
Before we talk, my RIG:

Matrox Mystique 220
486-DX 266
8 MB RAM
Display: 17" VGA CRT 60 Hz

The Game is installed on HDD. BUT

WTF is this. I get it. I do not meet the minimum Requirements. But this is an old school High end RIG. I still play modern Games like Jazz Jackrabbit for example on decent Mid Range Settings with consistent 60-80 FPS.
Nero Mar 3 @ 12:43am 
Originally posted by A Good Joe:
Before we talk, my RIG:

Matrox Mystique 220
486-DX 266
8 MB RAM
Display: 17" VGA CRT 60 Hz

The Game is installed on HDD. BUT

WTF is this. I get it. I do not meet the minimum Requirements. But this is an old school High end RIG. I still play modern Games like Jazz Jackrabbit for example on decent Mid Range Settings with consistent 60-80 FPS.
Humblebrag ..
And here im sitting with the "Nimrod" Computer from 1951 ...
< >
Showing 16-30 of 43 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Mar 2 @ 12:24am
Posts: 43