Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This. I have a 9800X3d with a 7900xtx and it still runs like ♥♥♥♥. However, thanks to my rig, I am able to get stable fps, but do have bad dips. I actually had to use *shudders* frame gen to smooth my curve out. Hi-res texture pack and only using 9gbs of my 24gbs VRAM and still runs like garbage on pure rasterisation. No RT.
Don't come to the Steam forums of a newly released popular game for any kind of serious question/advice/discussion. All the people telling you your rig is the problem are either kids or trolls (90% of people in such forums).
The game's optimization is non-existent. Even high-end rigs struggle. You're right that lowering settings makes the game look exponentially worse while barely uplifting performance, multiple people have confirmed that.
My friend runs the game on an R5 3600 and an RTX 2060. It runs poorly, but he can get somewhere between 50 and 60 fps at 1440p, low/medium settings, with FSR Balanced.
The 1080 ti is literally more powerful than a 2060, so you should be fine to at least get "playable" framerates. The CPU might bottleneck you in some instances though.
If the game was properly optimized, your rig should be able to run this game at comfortable settings and framerate, no problem. Unfortunately, it is not. It looks worse than MH:World, a game released 7 years ago, while performing disproportionately worse. Just yet another 2024/2025 release where lazy devs forgo optimization and use upscaling and framegen as a crutch instead.
EDIT : more reasonable posts than I expected in this thread. I actually had only read the first couple of replies and expected the rest to the the usual spam of trolls telling you your rig sucks / you're poor / etc. so I had skipped them.
ok bcs i do not understand the market. I did Upgrade from a Radeon HD 6800 to 1080 Ti back in time. It was such a massive boost, that it was worth the 800 € back then. I figured, that when i wait a few years and upgrade from a 1080 ti to lets say a 4060 for around 300 € it would again be a massive boost in performance for cheap cash. But it appears that in Benchmarks the 1080 ti in raw power is somewhat stronger. The newer cards just seem to have the technological edge with new performance enhancing techs. But to see nearly 8 years later, that a 4080 is "4k Ready" is such a disappointment. That was THE EXAKT SAME Marketing they did with my 1080TI back then. But nobody seems to acknowledge this.
seems pretty self explanatory; you said it in the first sentence.. "you do not meet the minimum requirements"
ye, but its about the comparison to other state of the art games like Space Marine 2 where i also do not meet the minimum requirements, but can play it nonetheless and in good quality and NATIVE WQHD
EDIT: I suggest that you refund the game and wait for sale if you can.
Except he not only surpasses the minimum requirements, but also the recommended ones. The recommended GPU is a 2060. The 1080 ti is faster than that.
Matrox Mystique 220
486-DX 266
8 MB RAM
Display: 17" VGA CRT 60 Hz
The Game is installed on HDD. BUT
WTF is this. I get it. I do not meet the minimum Requirements. But this is an old school High end RIG. I still play modern Games like Jazz Jackrabbit for example on decent Mid Range Settings with consistent 60-80 FPS.
And here im sitting with the "Nimrod" Computer from 1951 ...