Monster Hunter Wilds

Monster Hunter Wilds

View Stats:
World looks way better
Just how...
< >
Showing 1-15 of 27 comments
The jungle setting with the ocean and boats is a really cool setting, and the multi-biome nature of the island was fun....

This game tried to be bigger....and it looks bigger, and more monotone as a result
I am playing on a 4090 with max settings, DLAA enabled, framegen enabled, fog low, and everything that intentionally blurs the image off. This game looks much better than World.
Originally posted by Patrick Swayze:
I am playing on a 4090 with max settings, DLAA enabled, framegen enabled, fog low, and everything that intentionally blurs the image off. This game looks much better than World.
I have only gotten to Congalala (waiting for friends to get off work), So I have only scrapped the forest so far
The Debauchery (Banned) Feb 28 @ 6:08pm 
Originally posted by Blackmagemasher:
This game tried to be bigger....and it looks bigger, and more monotone as a result
Desert.
Most previous MH games have had the common sense to start in areas with greenery.
The Wilds team made the smoothbrain decision to start in the desert... and make it a really huge desert. A landscape where everything is roughly the same shade of brown and the air is constantly hazy.


Originally posted by Patrick Swayze:
I am playing on a 4090 with max settings, DLAA enabled, framegen enabled, fog low, and everything that intentionally blurs the image off. This game looks much better than World.
You could be playing on a sci-fi computer from the 26th century and Wilds would still be brown.
Last edited by The Debauchery; Feb 28 @ 6:09pm
Yoda Feb 28 @ 6:10pm 
Originally posted by The Debauchery:
Originally posted by Blackmagemasher:
This game tried to be bigger....and it looks bigger, and more monotone as a result
Desert.
Most previous MH games have had the common sense to start in areas with greenery.
The Wilds team made the smoothbrain decision to start in the desert... and make it a really huge desert. A landscape where everything is roughly the same shade of brown and the air is constantly hazy.
To me it looks way to washed out like piss era
Toffe Feb 28 @ 6:11pm 
Lol, no way. Graphics even impressed me at times. Like in the forest, Oil place, Railgun in the desert storm etc. :mhwgood:
The faces of the female characters also look much better than World.
Yoda Feb 28 @ 6:13pm 
The food still looks better in worlds.
I played Wilds for 1.9 hours, then turned it off and played World all day. World has perfect performance, colorful scenery, high resolution textures. And the gameplay seemed to be 99% identical from what little I played of Wilds. Is there anything that makes Wilds worth playing over World other than the newness factor? Genuinely asking
Mini Feb 28 @ 6:17pm 
i know man
Originally posted by Williamiare:
I played Wilds for 1.9 hours, then turned it off and played World all day. World has perfect performance, colorful scenery, high resolution textures. And the gameplay seemed to be 99% identical from what little I played of Wilds. Is there anything that makes Wilds worth playing over World other than the newness factor? Genuinely asking

I am sure your PC thanks you. Maybe your next one will be able to run it better and you'll get more from it
Last edited by Blackmagemasher; Feb 28 @ 6:19pm
J-Dawg Feb 28 @ 6:19pm 
Unfortunately I have to agree with you 💀 Could be a brightness calibration oversight in this game, and the windward plains is not a pleasant first impressions experience as compared to the maps of World and Rise (they had insane skyboxes)

Another thing which I found WILD is the non-existence of a contrast/saturation display setting in this game!
Yoda Feb 28 @ 6:19pm 
Worlds HD texture pack has more care than wild LOL
Eri Feb 28 @ 6:19pm 
Originally posted by Williamiare:
I played Wilds for 1.9 hours, then turned it off and played World all day. World has perfect performance, colorful scenery, high resolution textures. And the gameplay seemed to be 99% identical from what little I played of Wilds. Is there anything that makes Wilds worth playing over World other than the newness factor? Genuinely asking
Yeah but already no one remember how bad was world on release and ofc after 7 years of release game now very good. Wilds has serious technical issues but overall imo it has more potential than world
Last edited by Eri; Feb 28 @ 6:20pm
Toffe Feb 28 @ 6:20pm 
Originally posted by Williamiare:
I played Wilds for 1.9 hours, then turned it off and played World all day. World has perfect performance, colorful scenery, high resolution textures. And the gameplay seemed to be 99% identical from what little I played of Wilds. Is there anything that makes Wilds worth playing over World other than the newness factor? Genuinely asking

Not really? I mean if you haven't played worlds, then play that till you run out of things to do.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 27 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Feb 28 @ 6:02pm
Posts: 27