Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
some reviews are saying their benchmark doesn't match the launch game or even beta performance, saying its worse in game now than their original results
running all settings high, fsr + fg, fsr set to quality and the scaling thing 95.
im getting 100fps allround, no blur, no noticable input lag or anything of the sort
im not kidding it looks (and runs) better than when i tried dlss
I'd be more interested without frame gen.
I used to have a GTX 1660 SUPER before the RTX 4060 - would be very curious about native performance on that GPU in this game.
Edit: Didn't beat chatacabra, but i did beat the chicken. Fps was 40 on closed areas, on that big valley where the animals gather and there's a small pond it dipped to 30 while i was fighting chicken, but after it ran to it's nest Fps went up to 40 again, so i'd say around 40-30 fps without frame gen. No stuttering too, feels great.