Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
some reviews are saying their benchmark doesn't match the launch game or even beta performance, saying its worse in game now than their original results
running all settings high, fsr + fg, fsr set to quality and the scaling thing 95.
im getting 100fps allround, no blur, no noticable input lag or anything of the sort
im not kidding it looks (and runs) better than when i tried dlss
I'd be more interested without frame gen.
I used to have a GTX 1660 SUPER before the RTX 4060 - would be very curious about native performance on that GPU in this game.
Edit: Didn't beat chatacabra, but i did beat the chicken. Fps was 40 on closed areas, on that big valley where the animals gather and there's a small pond it dipped to 30 while i was fighting chicken, but after it ran to it's nest Fps went up to 40 again, so i'd say around 40-30 fps without frame gen. No stuttering too, feels great.