Monster Hunter Wilds

Monster Hunter Wilds

View Stats:
Is The Performance Better Than The Beta?
Hello. I am a broke stupid idiot who can't currently afford the game so I wanted to know if the performance when actually playing the game is better than the beta? How is the settlement area? Is it basically like the benchmark numbers suggests?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 65 comments
its garbage like the benchmark when the beta ran and worked 0 crashes, but its crashing non stop like benchmark, run it in windows 8 compat and it works but crazy flickers just like benchmark, never had to do that for betas and no issue only benchmark and game.
Originally posted by Kat The Wolfheart:
NO
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
regular mf Feb 27 @ 10:54pm 
IT IS, it's so much better than the beta, at least for me.
i5 12400F
RTX 3060 12GB
32GB Ram 3600

Latest Nvidia Driver (today)

Medium Preset
DLSS Quality and capped 60FPS with RTSS to get consistent frametime
1920x1080

Yeah it has some hiccups here and there, especially in the village.
But you can just swap to AMD Framegen + Native or Quality upscalling and wabaam!

Or you can try DLSS Swapper to get the latest DLSS version (But do it at your own risk)
Dae Feb 27 @ 10:55pm 
Likely worse thanks to Denuvo.
Salamilid Feb 27 @ 11:00pm 
Originally posted by regular mf:
IT IS, it's so much better than the beta, at least for me.
i5 12400F
RTX 3060 12GB
32GB Ram 3600

Latest Nvidia Driver (today)

Medium Preset
DLSS Quality and capped 60FPS with RTSS to get consistent frametime
1920x1080

Yeah it has some hiccups here and there, especially in the village.
But you can just swap to AMD Framegen + Native or Quality upscalling and wabaam!

Or you can try DLSS Swapper to get the latest DLSS version (But do it at your own risk)

2010 called, they want their graphics performance settings back. For real though, I want to play a new MH bad, but seeing how poorly the game runs pisses me off. 🙄😮‍💨🥱
Rager Feb 27 @ 11:02pm 
This game runs like trash on mid range machines. Anyone who says they getting over 60 fps maxed out is lying. And trust me this forum has tons of them.

This game runs poorly. 50-60 fps and stutters. Not to even to say that frame gen with reflex makes doing parries a chore.


This game is trash.
Ludicrits Feb 27 @ 11:03pm 
Nope. I get about 80fps in cities at 4k with dlss quality.

I usually get that with dlaa in other games....
Last edited by Ludicrits; Feb 27 @ 11:03pm
Originally posted by Rager:
This game runs like trash on mid range machines. Anyone who says they getting over 60 fps maxed out is lying. And trust me this forum has tons of them.

This game runs poorly. 50-60 fps and stutters. Not to even to say that frame gen with reflex makes doing parries a chore.


This game is trash.
i believe you. it has mixed ratings on steam just like dragons dogma 2 on release.
milk Feb 27 @ 11:04pm 
No, even with upscale and FG, but I can eat that. The only problem is it's crashed a minute ago.
Razzle Feb 27 @ 11:05pm 
Originally posted by StardomPlays:
Hello. I am a broke stupid idiot who can't currently afford the game so I wanted to know if the performance when actually playing the game is better than the beta? How is the settlement area? Is it basically like the benchmark numbers suggests?
yes
I was on the fence, didnt know whether i should or shouldnt buy as it worked like an ass on my 3 years old PC (1440p, RTX 3080).
Sad.
Looks like crap and also runs like crap while World ran on same rig on Ultra settings at 90fps.
L Feb 27 @ 11:06pm 
The game is running fine for me, and better then the beta. I have no idea what everyone is talking about, also the mixed reviews are mainly from those who cannot connect (which is a norm) in most cases.

Overall, this game runs significantly better then the Beta in which I played all three versions of the beta, and they were sub-par at best. The optimization has definitely improved and I run with much better fps overall.
L Feb 27 @ 11:07pm 
Originally posted by Lord Commander Dante:
I was on the fence, didnt know whether i should or shouldnt buy as it worked like an ass on my 3 years old PC (1440p, RTX 3080).
Sad.
Looks like crap and also runs like crap while World ran on same rig on Ultra settings at 90fps.

Don't have selective memory, Worlds ran like trash on release for the PC. Why do people not remember this? While Wilds is running 10x better on release than Worlds ever did.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 65 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Feb 27 @ 10:35pm
Posts: 65