i just watched a streamer with a 4090 graphics card

[HeInZ]

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥, wth did i just see..... how can this be allowed to release a game that runs that bad... hoooooly. Capcom Classic

[thumper]

The optimisations they've made since I played the first beta are so heavy handed. I just tried the benchmark and while I get an average of about 89fps, max setting, no frame gen at 5120x1440 the pop in of monsters and shadows is insane.
The part in the benchmark when it gets to the settlement has some abysmal artifacting on shadows and textures and it STILL tanks to 50fps.

You can tell that they've had to make some drastic decisions in order to try and improve performance but at the cost of the game being the worst looking i've seen in years. It literally looks as bad as a Switch game.

The only thing that'll keep this game from being mostly negative will be the monster hunter fan boys telling everyone that it's the best thing they've ever played.

[ƬᗩԲԲվ]

Originally posted by Verde:

Seriously, what's the point of spreading such blatant misinformation when people already played the game on far weaker systems during the Beta and could maintain 60+ FPS throughout their experience.

They recommend frame gen for 60 FPS. You understand this is unheard of right? It's definitely not misinformation. But I'll answer why I'm spreading the message that it's poor optimization.

I love monster hunter and if performance is this subpar capcom deserves their ass ridden until they fix it. Because they did nothing for dragon's dogma 2.

[Something]

The last playable beta we had though was also the same beta as the first round of playable betas so it wasn't updated with the benchmark version's tweaks and improvements. My performance in the benchmark was SIGNIFICANTLY better than my performance in the beta. While with frame gen I still got above 100+ FPS in the beta, my God the game looked like complete and utter buttcheeks. It was like someone poured Vaseline in my eyes. I had to take the DLSS 4 files from Cyberpunk 2077 and put them into the MH Wilds beta folder in order to get the game to have ANY sort of visual improvement one might mistake as "clear". This is the issue I hope is fixed in the launch version of the game. Otherwise it'll get a refund from me.

[_Synt3rax_]

Additional Notes: SSD required. This game is expected to run at 1080p / 60 fps (with Frame Generation enabled) under the "Medium" graphics setting. DirectStorage supported.

This alone shows how utterly ♥♥♥♥♥♥ the Performance is and they expect you to run it with FrameGen on because the Game would run like a Slideshow without it.

[Tenko]

Originally posted by _Synt3rax_:

Additional Notes: SSD required..

If you didnt know this you deserve what ever wrong happens to you.

[Killance]

I've been watching them all morning and they're games are running great and look great too.

[Something]

Originally posted by Killance:

I've been watching them all morning and they're games are running great and look great too.

Their games look great because of bitrate compression. When you and I get our hands on it it'll probably look a lot less sharp. And their games run great because they are all running 5,000 dollar + PC's that can just eat technical issues like candy.

[Verde]

Originally posted by Mag Smrodu:

Their games look great because of bitrate compression. When you and I get our hands on it it'll probably look a lot less sharp.

What kind of backwards logic is that? The game looks BETTER because of compression? Jesus...these people will say anything just to stick to their narrative xD

[Something]

Originally posted by Verde:

Originally posted by Mag Smrodu:

Their games look great because of bitrate compression. When you and I get our hands on it it'll probably look a lot less sharp.

What kind of backwards logic is that? The game looks BETTER because of compression? Jesus...these people will say anything just to stick to their narrative xD

Just because you don't get how something works doesn't make it backwards logic. It's the reason why your game can look like an Anti-Aliased nightmare while a streamers game looks sharp and crisp despite running the same settings on basically the same rig. Not my fault you don't understand how something works.

[Kiririn]

Yeah, performance is poopoo at the moment. Hopefully that's fixed sooner rather than later but based on DD2 I'm not sure it's going to be fixed anytime soon.

[Something]

Originally posted by Kiririn:

Yeah, performance is poopoo at the moment. Hopefully that's fixed sooner rather than later but based on DD2 I'm not sure it's going to be fixed anytime soon.

The DD2 devs though also said that they designed there game around 34 FPS and they were never gonna change it so while DD2 runs like crap, that "crap" 34 fps is intended by the developers. The only reason why people get higher than 34 fps is because they're system literally just pushes the game above that. It's not because the game was designed around 60 and just was poorly optimized.

[Kiririn]

Originally posted by Mag Smrodu:

The DD2 devs though also said that they designed there game around 34 FPS and they were never gonna change it so while DD2 runs like crap, that "crap" 34 fps is intended by the developers. The only reason why people get higher than 34 fps is because they're system literally just pushes the game above that. It's not because the game was designed around 60 and just was poorly optimized.

Damn...you might have just killed Wilds.

Maybe that's why Capcom recommends frame gen to hit 60. 34 fps plus FG is about 60.

[Verde]

Originally posted by Mag Smrodu:

Just because you don't get how something works doesn't make it backwards logic. It's the reason why your game can look like an Anti-Aliased nightmare while a streamers game looks sharp and crisp despite running the same settings on basically the same rig. Not my fault you don't understand how something works.

You're a genuine imbecile if you truly think that video compression makes the image look better. That's all there is to your nonsensical, clueless comment.

[Something]

Originally posted by Verde:

Originally posted by Mag Smrodu:

Just because you don't get how something works doesn't make it backwards logic. It's the reason why your game can look like an Anti-Aliased nightmare while a streamers game looks sharp and crisp despite running the same settings on basically the same rig. Not my fault you don't understand how something works.

You're a genuine imbecile if you truly think that video compression makes the image look better. That's all there is to your nonsensical, clueless comment.

Lay the truth on me then Kemosabe. I'm all ears. Enlighten my "Nonsensical, clueless self". I'm all eyes.

[thumper]

Pick one bro, you're either all ears or you're all eyes. You can't be both!