Monster Hunter Wilds

Monster Hunter Wilds

View Stats:
Graphic Setting Recommendations for 2080 Super?
I have ran the benchmark a number of times. Making variations each time to try and get the best performance and quality.. honestly its not super great. First thing is DLSS, seems it has to be enabled otherwise ♥♥♥♥♥ the bed. I can get an excellent score, latest was 21342.. but some areas especially towns look like dogwater and drop to 30 fps. Any more advice or NVIDIA app/control panel settings?

My Hardware/Specs
+ i7-10700K 3.8GHz CPU @ 4.00GHz
+ MSI MEG Z490 ACE
+ NVIDIA RTX 2080 SUPER
+ G.Skill 32GB DDR4
+ Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB | SATA (OS Drive)
+ Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB | NVME (Gaming Drive)
+ EVGA SuperNOVA 850W 80+ Gold

Wilds Graphic Settings
Graphics Settings = Custom
Upscaling (Super-resolution Imaging) = NVIDIA DLSS
Frame Generation = Disable
Upscaling Mode = Performance
Ray Tracing = Off
Texture Quality = High
Texture Filtering Quality = Low (Trilinear)
Mesh Quality = High
Fur Quality = Low
Sky/Cloud Quality = Lowest
Grass/Tree Quality = Low
Grass/Tree Sway = Disable
Wind Simulation Quality = Low
Surface Quality = Low
Sand/Snow Quality = Lowest
Water Effects = Disable
Render Distance = High
Shadow Quality = Low
Distant Shadow Quality = Low
Shadow Distance = Medium
Ambient Light Quality = Low
Contact Shadows = Disable
Ambient Occlusion = Off
Bloom = Off
Motion Blur = Off
Vignette Effect = Off
Screen Space Reflection = Off
SSSS Scattering = Off
Depth of Field = Off
Volumetric Fog = Low
Variable Rate Shading = Off
< >
Showing 1-15 of 32 comments
Shield Feb 26 @ 10:07am 
upgrade your pc :steamthumbsup: otherwise ur pc might able to run Rise the switch port :steamthumbsup: happy hunting!
crispb Feb 26 @ 10:19am 
Originally posted by Shield:
upgrade your pc :steamthumbsup: otherwise ur pc might able to run Rise the switch port :steamthumbsup: happy hunting!

rip.
Stranger Feb 26 @ 10:24am 
Originally posted by Shield:
upgrade your pc :steamthumbsup: otherwise ur pc might able to run Rise the switch port :steamthumbsup: happy hunting!
clown, not even gonna waste the points on that
Ranch Feb 26 @ 10:29am 
Sorry man you dont have a nasa supercomputer. So unfortunately you cant play this. but dont worry, no one else will be able to either.
you have texture and mesh quality at high, try lowering those, if that does not get you to 60, the best thing I can suggest is to leave settings as they are and cap your FPS at 30.
a smooth 30 will be better then a "capped 60" jumping randomly around between 30 and 60
Stranger Feb 26 @ 10:31am 
2
I got a Ryzen 9 3900X, 32GB RAM, and RTX 2080 Super. Played the beta fine, running the benchmark I got 106.56 FPS on average, score of 18208. Set settings to medium as a base to start and then made adjustments from there. changed Upscaling from DLSS to FSR, turned on Frame Generation, Upscaling mode to Balanced, Sharpness to 1.00, Ray Tracing to Low, Texture Quality to High, Sky to Highest, Vignette to Off, SSSS Scattering to Off, and Variable Rate Shading to Balanced. Give it a run and see how you feel about the performance and graphical quality. Make adjustments as needed. Initial run had some texture pop in to start but afterwards everything looked and ran perfectly fine.

Yes upgrades are needed but personally I'm happy with the FPS and quality of graphics, it'll get me to Nov when I can finally do some upgrades.
Sajku Feb 26 @ 10:32am 
Just play Rise, it is a better game anyway with tons of content.
Syphael Feb 26 @ 11:04am 
So I use a RTX 2080 with the medium preset, no depth of field, no motion blur, and no frame gen. I'm able to hit 56 fps steady.
NiamhNyx Feb 26 @ 11:09am 
To fix the issues with the fps drops in town, you would need a better cpu, thats all there is to it. my i7-12700k gets an initial drop down to 40fps before averaging out to around 60 fps.
RE Engine npcs are really heavy on cpus.
Last edited by NiamhNyx; Feb 26 @ 11:09am
crispb Feb 26 @ 11:26am 
Originally posted by Stranger:
I got a Ryzen 9 3900X, 32GB RAM, and RTX 2080 Super. Played the beta fine, running the benchmark I got 106.56 FPS on average, score of 18208. Set settings to medium as a base to start and then made adjustments from there. changed Upscaling from DLSS to FSR, turned on Frame Generation, Upscaling mode to Balanced, Sharpness to 1.00, Ray Tracing to Low, Texture Quality to High, Sky to Highest, Vignette to Off, SSSS Scattering to Off, and Variable Rate Shading to Balanced. Give it a run and see how you feel about the performance and graphical quality. Make adjustments as needed. Initial run had some texture pop in to start but afterwards everything looked and ran perfectly fine.

Yes upgrades are needed but personally I'm happy with the FPS and quality of graphics, it'll get me to Nov when I can finally do some upgrades.

oh interesting. didn't think FSR would work on NVIDIA card. thought that was specific to AMD.
Stranger Feb 26 @ 11:32am 
Originally posted by crispb:
Originally posted by Stranger:
I got a Ryzen 9 3900X, 32GB RAM, and RTX 2080 Super. Played the beta fine, running the benchmark I got 106.56 FPS on average, score of 18208. Set settings to medium as a base to start and then made adjustments from there. changed Upscaling from DLSS to FSR, turned on Frame Generation, Upscaling mode to Balanced, Sharpness to 1.00, Ray Tracing to Low, Texture Quality to High, Sky to Highest, Vignette to Off, SSSS Scattering to Off, and Variable Rate Shading to Balanced. Give it a run and see how you feel about the performance and graphical quality. Make adjustments as needed. Initial run had some texture pop in to start but afterwards everything looked and ran perfectly fine.

Yes upgrades are needed but personally I'm happy with the FPS and quality of graphics, it'll get me to Nov when I can finally do some upgrades.

oh interesting. didn't think FSR would work on NVIDIA card. thought that was specific to AMD.

It works and in my opinion it seems to be better than the DLSS from Nvidia
BongO Feb 26 @ 11:35am 
Bro has a potato PC and complain for poor performance.. brothet uuu, brother why
You can play this game, my 2070 could decently handle high with custom tweaks. I however have a stronger cpu ryzen 9 7950x3d

The only concern you might have is a cpu bottleneck, go with medium with some custom tweaks, lower anything CPU related to prevent any issues. See how the benchmark goes.
Originally posted by Stranger:
Originally posted by crispb:

oh interesting. didn't think FSR would work on NVIDIA card. thought that was specific to AMD.

It works and in my opinion it seems to be better than the DLSS from Nvidia

Yes, FSR works brilliantly specially all nvidia GPUs in prior to 40 and 50 series. The reason for that, is DLSS3.7, which basically is NOT supported for pre-40 series.

I found DLLS optimization particularly troubling, and another area is excessive vram usage.

There are areas for improvements, which all mean that there will only be a better future.
crispb Feb 26 @ 11:53am 
Originally posted by KingOfFriedChicken:
You can play this game, my 2070 could decently handle high with custom tweaks. I however have a stronger cpu ryzen 9 7950x3d

The only concern you might have is a cpu bottleneck, go with medium with some custom tweaks, lower anything CPU related to prevent any issues. See how the benchmark goes.

thanks. yeah, in original post i set practically everything to Lowest setting. One of the others mentioned FSR. So I tried FSR w/ Frame Gen (not sure why this works but doesn't on DLSS). ended up averaging 113 FPS but score was only Good. bit confusing
< >
Showing 1-15 of 32 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Feb 26 @ 10:02am
Posts: 33