Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yes, why would I run without FG?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3427418364
For much better image quality in motion. If you're willing to sacrifice that or can't notice the difference, then there is no issue. Have fun. Doesn't really matter what others think if you find it acceptable.
Game really needs DLSS4 to clean up TAA and stability in motion though. I haven't run the benchmark in a while, but think it didn't even have a sharpening setting which is kind of a must even with later versions of DLSS3.
The game is 1/10 optimization tho
I'm not arguing against that or your choice to use FG. Just saying why someone would want to run most games without FG. 2x FG isn't bad in a lot of games with DLSS4 if the base framerate is at least 60 FPS though. The issues compound at lower frame rates and higher frame insertion setings like 3x and 4x, however.
I fully agree that the optimization is unacceptable.
On other games I’m getting 130+ ultra with RT.. 3440p
It’s really bad
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3434670284
One person can have a top of the lines GPU with crap CPU and get higher score than someone with way better CPU and mid range GPU even though that person might have way more stable frame rates.