Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
i say in 4-6 month we will get something big, like Kulve-Taroth or special event-quest elder dragons.
Both the IGN and Eurogamer reviewers claimed to be have played lots of MH and they both felt the game was too easy and too streamlined.
Maybe, if they put out something as good as extreme behemoth.
I'm happy enough.
ppl say that every gen so i can't take those comments at face value.
i wouldn't hold my breath for an extremoth type monster lol
I have trust here. Afterall this will be the main Monster Hunter game for the next 3-4 years. The content and challenges will grow like in the last games. I mean, if we are very cruel and make a very unfair comparison, we already get more then MH Rise had on release day 1. Even the story is longer with just the "core quests" in this one.
base games are LR and HR.
expansions are MR.
story doesn't typically end with LR to my knowledge
the only game in monster hunter history to hit you with a "come back in 6 months!" mid-story.
i suppose that's padded out with quest prep though so it can't be a fair comparison
Tri had the issue of not know what the key quests were, so you did not know what quests would progress the story. But the story in tri fully ended in low rank.