Monster Hunter Wilds

Monster Hunter Wilds

View Stats:
Carlos Feb 22 @ 1:42am
7
2
This game is full of crap but gets a pass
Looks bad, is blurry af, runs like crap, is infested with Denuvo and costs 70 bucks.

And yet has been at the top of the charts for months now.

Any other game would've been torn to shreds for this but this one gets a pass for some reason. No wonder publishers keep pulling all that crap.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 119 comments
Darkreaver1980 Feb 22 @ 1:44am 
2
Its a new monster hunter game!

It could have 3 different denuvos, cost 200$ and runs at 5 fps and people like me would still buy it!
Originally posted by Darkreaver1980:
It could have 3 different denuvos, cost 200$ and runs at 5 fps...
That would be a bit too much xDD
Carlos Feb 22 @ 1:51am 
Originally posted by Hans Moleman:
Originally posted by Darkreaver1980:
It could have 3 different denuvos, cost 200$ and runs at 5 fps...
That would be a bit too much xDD

The 5 FPS would be too much but I'm p. sure nobody gives a ♥♥♥♥ about Denuvo anymore and people would've actually paid 200 bucks, easily. Hell, people go so crazy for the 5090 you can't buy it even for 3k bucks. It's bonkers.
Not sure if there was a difference between the beta and the benchmark, but it didn't look blurry to me, I was able to get over 70 in the hard to run areas in the benchmark on ultra (94 average at 3440x1440), and there are multiple places I can buy it legit for under $60.
Last edited by VelcroSnake; Feb 22 @ 2:00am
it runs perfectly fine on a modern machine with high end parts and it looks quite good, one of those titles where it actually looks like a modern game.
it runs quite bad on a 600€ budget machine, but it still works and is playable, but it will look quite bad.

I have both for comparison and played the beta on both machines.

If this was ~23+ years ago you would be shred to pieces for not upgrading your PC and still wanting to play new gen titles, and not the developer.
Carlos Feb 22 @ 2:07am 
Originally posted by HoneyDrake:
it runs quite bad on a 600€ budget machine, but it still works and is playable, but it will look quite bad.
You can find plenty of posts about game running terribly on 3070s or even 3090s, dipping to 25 FPS.

The "Recommended" card is 2060 btw so your argument is puffed up BS.
Mechanique Feb 22 @ 2:23am 
Originally posted by Carlos:
Looks bad

It is the best looking MH game, and has an acceptable visuals overall

Originally posted by Carlos:
is blurry af
Only if you make it to look like that with improper graphic settings

Originally posted by Carlos:
runs like crap

Runs perfectly fine on modern hardware. 5+ years old GPUs are NOT modern hardware.

Originally posted by Carlos:
is infested with Denuvo
Does not matter for anyone with modern hardware. Only people that care about Denuvo is those who don't have the hardware to run the game properly to begin with.

Originally posted by Carlos:
and costs 70 bucks.
Top game, top price. I bought the premium too, because why not.

In conclusion, you are just a hater who is making ♥♥♥♥ up
Originally posted by Mechanique:
Originally posted by Carlos:
Looks bad

It is the best looking MH game, and has an acceptable visuals overall

Originally posted by Carlos:
is blurry af
Only if you make it to look like that with improper graphic settings

Originally posted by Carlos:
runs like crap

Runs perfectly fine on modern hardware. 5+ years old GPUs are NOT modern hardware.

Originally posted by Carlos:
is infested with Denuvo
Does not matter for anyone with modern hardware. Only people that care about Denuvo is those who don't have the hardware to run the game properly to begin with.

Originally posted by Carlos:
and costs 70 bucks.
Top game, top price. I bought the premium too, because why not.

In conclusion, you are just a hater who is making ♥♥♥♥ up

No it absolutely does run like garbage, people much smarter then you or I have determined that,

Also based on model rips of the beta the monsters have far too many polygons they should not be as high as they are, it's ridiculous.

I ran the beta at ultra on 1440p and it absoslutely does look blurry as hell, extremely muddy texture work, LoDs are very bad, because once again the monsters have far to many polygons.
😎Astran😾 Feb 22 @ 2:40am 
I feel bad for all the people unable to afford a $70 GOTY and thus making up excuses to deal with the grief :lunar2019shockedpig:
Burba Feb 22 @ 2:57am 
If your game is good enough and in demand you can get away with almost anything. My advice to game devs who get ripped to shreds for what ever reason? Make good games for audiences that want them.
侍Kage Feb 22 @ 3:01am 
Looks bad, is blurry af, runs like crap, is infested with Denuvo and costs 70 bucks.

I bet on my life if you had the game on your library rn for free or whatever, you would be playing this game more than us. So cut the bs and move on.
Foxens Feb 22 @ 3:12am 
ok
bad point fishing post
Carlos Feb 22 @ 3:44am 
Originally posted by Lordsquigs:
bad point fishing post
"Posts I don't like are just fishing."

ok
Originally posted by Darkreaver1980:
Its a new monster hunter game!

It could have 3 different denuvos, cost 200$ and runs at 5 fps and people like me would still buy it!
idk was ur problem is ... buy better pc and u play mh wilds max settings 2k with 165fps constant .....
< >
Showing 1-15 of 119 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Feb 22 @ 1:42am
Posts: 119