Store Page
Monster Hunter Wilds
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos News Guides Reviews

Monster Hunter Wilds

Store Page
View Stats:
Global Achievements
Inuakurei Mar 12 @ 8:28pm
Wild Hearts is a better game.
I'm already kind of bored with Wilds. Killed everything there is to kill, made 2 full builds with maxed out armor upgrades and decos, farmed some fashion sets, etc. Now I just do random SoS for fun, but even that is boring since every fight is stun locking the monster to death in sub 8mins.

That realization made me think of Wild Hearts and how much fun I had with that game before I was done with it. So out of curiosity I checked my playtime in both.

MHWilds 56 hours. Wild Hearts 98 hours. I'll surely play Wilds more in the long run, but I don't see it lasting another 50 hours on base content alone. When in contrast, somehow Wild Hearts held my interest about twice as long with it's base content before I was done.

What happened?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 39 comments
zero Mar 12 @ 8:32pm 
you simply liked wild hearts more, its not anything special.

nothing is stopping you from playing it when you want, but i personally find it not worth it considering its low content and it was DoA in terms of content updates
#1
NashDash Mar 12 @ 8:34pm 
Oh.. Wild Hearts was fun... go play the other Team Ninja games, baby. I wish I could join you, but WH sucks. They had they chance (more than 1) and they blew it. Cry a little more...
#2
Hampy123 Mar 12 @ 8:37pm 
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ lol
#3
Shakoris Mar 12 @ 8:39pm 
You liked the dodge spring and bad optimization worse than this?

Okay.
#4
Thatunnecessarilystrongguy_On_IG Mar 12 @ 8:45pm 
WH was fun but it lacked something. Idk, it's hard to fit into the Monster Hunter mold as a non-MH title. The game definitely was not bad and I put a decent amount of time into it though I don't recall finishing it (Stopped a bit after the ice wolf thing I think) due to losing interest. I think it had potential to be more if it was treated better by the devs and not just dropped. The fast paced combat was a nice change from the slow paced MH combat though, I did genuinely enjoy that and would have liked to see Wilds bring up the speed and fluidity of things a bit more.
#5
Kiririn Mar 12 @ 8:55pm 
You would be in a better position to tell us, tbh.

The aggressive streamlining. Lack of challenging and aspirational content. The fact that the hunters are insanely powerful compared to the punching bag monsters. The palicos. The seikret.

Lots of things I would imagine.
#6
Inuakurei Mar 12 @ 8:56pm 
Originally posted by Shakoris:
You liked the dodge spring and bad optimization worse than this?

Okay.

So far... Yea, actually. https://files.catbox.moe/5h9ouk.mp4
#7
Velber Mar 12 @ 9:21pm 
wtf is wild hearts?
#8
zero Mar 12 @ 9:22pm 
Originally posted by Velber:
wtf is wild hearts?
Ea's attempt at monster hunter
#9
Velber Mar 12 @ 9:22pm 
Originally posted by zero:
Originally posted by Velber:
wtf is wild hearts?
Ea's attempt at monster hunter
thats an ea game? eeewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
#10
Retsubty Mar 12 @ 9:31pm 
Wild Hearts certainly wasn't bad.

Ignore all the shallow, lame, thoughtless posts in here.

The cult will swallow you! Anything that isn't MH: Wilds is bad because they gotta prove their hollow point.

joooooooiiiiinnnnn usssssss. joiiiiiiiinnn usssssss. yaaaaaaasssss.
#11
Velber Mar 12 @ 9:35pm 
Originally posted by Tygo:
Wild Hearts certainly wasn't bad.

Ignore all the shallow, lame, thoughtless posts in here.

The cult will swallow you! Anything that isn't MH: Wilds is bad because they gotta prove their hollow point.

joooooooiiiiinnnnn usssssss. joiiiiiiiinnn usssssss. yaaaaaaasssss.
go play battlefield 1984 and pay for your skibbidy toilet skins EA scrub
#12
Retsubty Mar 12 @ 9:37pm 
Originally posted by Velber:
Originally posted by Tygo:
Wild Hearts certainly wasn't bad.

Ignore all the shallow, lame, thoughtless posts in here.

The cult will swallow you! Anything that isn't MH: Wilds is bad because they gotta prove their hollow point.

joooooooiiiiinnnnn usssssss. joiiiiiiiinnn usssssss. yaaaaaaasssss.
go play battlefield 1984 and pay for your skibbidy toilet skins EA scrub

Generations U/4U is where it is at. Zoomers can't appreciate a good Monster Hunter game.
#13
Velber Mar 12 @ 9:43pm 
Originally posted by Tygo:
Originally posted by Velber:
go play battlefield 1984 and pay for your skibbidy toilet skins EA scrub

Generations U/4U is where it is at. Zoomers can't appreciate a good Monster Hunter game.
i played tri you dilopodis handkerchief
#14
Kamakura Mar 12 @ 9:44pm 
I thought Wild Heart was fine, it had good ideas, but just because you could invest more time into it, doesn't make it the better game. It had its own issues, particularly performance that I don't believe they ever fully fixed. It also got a limited amount of post-release support before having support ended.

In the end, I thought it was too much like Monster Hunter directly, not doing enough to truly stand out, to the point that I never beat the story, it just made me want to go back and play World. It's like...why play the clear knockoff, when I can play some more World or even play Rise, which I never got into it's post-game or Sunbreak.

Wilds has it's issues and hopefully it can fix stuff up, but I'm gonna enjoy Wilds far longer than I ever did Wild Heart.
#15
< >
Showing 1-15 of 39 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Monster Hunter Wilds > General Discussions > Topic Details
Date Posted: Mar 12 @ 8:28pm
Posts: 39

Discussions Rules and Guidelines