Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Have you sincerely never heard of the concept of self inserting? Every RPG player wants to see an aspect of themselves in the characters they create, whether it be their idealized self or who they truly are. Also, don't pull the "You're gay' ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ just because a person wants to play as their own gender. Only a moronic knuckle-dragger with absolutely nothing to add to this world for the entire duration of their life would stoop that low - and you're not *quite* that, right?
The real "paradox of tolerance" is that we tolerated the ESG/DEI cult for too long, and it led us to the mess we’re in today—if only we had fought harder against it in the 2010s.
You're so edgy I just cut myself reading your comment.
Yes, this is why when you take a group of players with female avatars and organize them to a LAN or convention they all turn out to be straight white men (without gender dysphoria). What part of "Role Playing" in "Role Playing Game" did you not get? We're not on a zoom call and we're definitely not trying to make any form of an accurate avatar that reflects who we are IRL. We make a character, we play the game.
If you seriously decide to look at male ass for hours on end, you are gay. There is no discussion possible on this matter. I know truth sucks, but there is simply no other possibility. But when you preach all this about tolerance and all that, being gay is fine right? So what's the problem in being called gay then?
I still like to laugh at this from time to time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r369Zu4RKCo
And the Latest Hit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKJzsmzTTws
The war over these issues is over because
2025 is shaping up to be a really great year. It'll be the year that woke officially gets put to pasture, and the year of territorial conquests by based nations against low-T nations.
It's going to be 4+ years of the wokies have a secret hurricane gun they keep blasting, and wild fires are being caused by too many woke firefighters. Or that Sony is secretly controlled by SJWs funded by George Soros.
"get a life"- Hector Elizondo
And within those 4 years, we're still stuck with the blackrock funded companies trying to shove political activism down our throats. Worst is, none of these companies will actually die, they will all get bought by Microsoft at some point. I would not be surprised that at some point in the next 4 years all AAA games are owned by Microsoft and stringent regulation will be unleashed upon the indies to make sure they can't compete (corporatism 101).
You think every straight white man, when trying to make "their idealized self or who they truly are", end up making female characters? If that's from personal observation, you probably just know a lot of closeted trans people.
You must understand that not everyone goes into character creation with the same mentality as you, right? People do actually enjoy making representations of themselves in the games they play.
Oops, I guess no straight people played the witcher games then. Or assassins creed, or the bathman arkham games, or the first nioh, or the first fable, etc.
I mean, if you were straight you'd just choose to play a different game, right? Clearly everyone plays games just so they can look at their character. No one actually plays games for the gameplay.