Arma 3
34 оценки
Ragnarok'44 mod (IFA3) - v1.16
   
Награда
Добавяне към любими
В любими
Премахване от любими
Data Type: Mod
Размер на файла
Публикуван на
Обновен на
8.247 MB
23 окт. 2016 в 4:11
16 юни 2018 в 23:23
2 бележки за промени ( преглед )

Абониране, за да се свали
Ragnarok'44 mod (IFA3) - v1.16

В 2 колекции от Gunter Severloh
All Arma 3 WW2 Mods Compilation List
531 артикула
Ragnarok'44 Mission Series - (WW2 RTS for IFA3)
14 артикула
Описание
This is the base mod that all Ragnarok'44 missions require.
Using this mod by itself does nothing, and adds nothing to the game.

When playing a Ragnarok'44 mission, the mission will use components
and functions from this mod.

This is also a modified and updated version of WOO which is a mission/mode/mod that Monkalb created for Arma2.
In 2013 I had acquired permissions from Mondkalb to use his WOO, and port it to Iron front in Arma2OA for the IFA2 version of Iron front.

This version of Ragnarok'44 mod has been updated again to work with Ragnarok'44 missions
for IFA3 (Iron front in Arma3).
=============
Any questions can also be asked on the official release thread for the mod and missions here:
https://forums.bistudio.com/forums/topic/196146-sp-ragnarok44/
37 коментара
Gunter Severloh  [автор] 9 юни 2023 в 14:14 
Use the release thread https://forums.bistudio.com/forums/topic/196146-sp-ragnarok44/
then you can post all your thoughts in one post as comments are limited.
csepi0101 9 юни 2023 в 10:50 
although it is likely that this "production phase" is also part of the AI logic

now not work yet,only one vehicle is contstructed, in a row 54 and 77 i think so not need the ";" symbol
csepi0101 9 юни 2023 в 9:44 
I'm a idiot....it's not the player section that's important, but the AI section should have more vehicles.......
csepi0101 9 юни 2023 в 8:27 
not abnormal....sorry
csepi0101 9 юни 2023 в 8:17 
this is not abnormal?>>> then {_IcantBelieveItsNotButter = true;};
the " ; " symbol in wrong place?
csepi0101 9 юни 2023 в 7:46 
this is already interesting :) thanks
I'll try it right away....

(I also started from "_theveh" first, I spelled it wrong...)
Rydygier  [автор] 9 юни 2023 в 7:25 
That's all, I can provide right now. Good luck...
Rydygier  [автор] 9 юни 2023 в 7:24 
Although no time now for deep analyse, seems, the code part to be repeated starts from:

_theveh = _vehType createvehicle _spawnpos;

and ends at:

_texty = format ["%1 constructed", _UnitName];

In total something like:

https://codeshare.io/xv4DpR

BUT there easily maybe more to it elsewhere in the logic, and this is not tested so not sure, if that would work. For example, perhaps only one of those vehicles will be controllable...
csepi0101 9 юни 2023 в 7:06 
_constans......or......._variable...rather
csepi0101 9 юни 2023 в 7:02 
If i repeated only from "then { _theveh1........." to .........moveInCommander _theveh1;
}}}; .........." with new constans like "_theveh1" (only the "_units" and "_newgrp" is not modified)
then again not work.

[[POWERcost, CRATEscost,BuildTIME,"Display Name", "Icon","PanelPicture"],["unit", "unit", "unit"], "Vehicle"]
I found the definition of this array a while ago in a file, but I don't know in which file, I think it should be rewritten to include several vehicle variables