Arma 3
34 voti
Ragnarok'44 mod (IFA3) - v1.16
   
Premio
Aggiungi ai preferiti
Preferito
Rimuovi dai preferiti
Data Type: Mod
Dimensioni del file
Pubblicato in data
Aggiornato in data
8.247 MB
23 ott 2016, ore 4:11
16 giu 2018, ore 23:23
2 note di rilascio ( visualizza )

Sottoscrivi per scaricare
Ragnarok'44 mod (IFA3) - v1.16

In 2 collezioni di Gunter Severloh
All Arma 3 WW2 Mods Compilation List
524 elementi
Ragnarok'44 Mission Series - (WW2 RTS for IFA3)
14 elementi
Descrizione
This is the base mod that all Ragnarok'44 missions require.
Using this mod by itself does nothing, and adds nothing to the game.

When playing a Ragnarok'44 mission, the mission will use components
and functions from this mod.

This is also a modified and updated version of WOO which is a mission/mode/mod that Monkalb created for Arma2.
In 2013 I had acquired permissions from Mondkalb to use his WOO, and port it to Iron front in Arma2OA for the IFA2 version of Iron front.

This version of Ragnarok'44 mod has been updated again to work with Ragnarok'44 missions
for IFA3 (Iron front in Arma3).
=============
Any questions can also be asked on the official release thread for the mod and missions here:
https://forums.bistudio.com/forums/topic/196146-sp-ragnarok44/
37 commenti
Gunter Severloh  [autore] 9 giu 2023, ore 14:14 
Use the release thread https://forums.bistudio.com/forums/topic/196146-sp-ragnarok44/
then you can post all your thoughts in one post as comments are limited.
csepi0101 9 giu 2023, ore 10:50 
although it is likely that this "production phase" is also part of the AI logic

now not work yet,only one vehicle is contstructed, in a row 54 and 77 i think so not need the ";" symbol
csepi0101 9 giu 2023, ore 9:44 
I'm a idiot....it's not the player section that's important, but the AI section should have more vehicles.......
csepi0101 9 giu 2023, ore 8:27 
not abnormal....sorry
csepi0101 9 giu 2023, ore 8:17 
this is not abnormal?>>> then {_IcantBelieveItsNotButter = true;};
the " ; " symbol in wrong place?
csepi0101 9 giu 2023, ore 7:46 
this is already interesting :) thanks
I'll try it right away....

(I also started from "_theveh" first, I spelled it wrong...)
Rydygier  [autore] 9 giu 2023, ore 7:25 
That's all, I can provide right now. Good luck...
Rydygier  [autore] 9 giu 2023, ore 7:24 
Although no time now for deep analyse, seems, the code part to be repeated starts from:

_theveh = _vehType createvehicle _spawnpos;

and ends at:

_texty = format ["%1 constructed", _UnitName];

In total something like:

https://codeshare.io/xv4DpR

BUT there easily maybe more to it elsewhere in the logic, and this is not tested so not sure, if that would work. For example, perhaps only one of those vehicles will be controllable...
csepi0101 9 giu 2023, ore 7:06 
_constans......or......._variable...rather
csepi0101 9 giu 2023, ore 7:02 
If i repeated only from "then { _theveh1........." to .........moveInCommander _theveh1;
}}}; .........." with new constans like "_theveh1" (only the "_units" and "_newgrp" is not modified)
then again not work.

[[POWERcost, CRATEscost,BuildTIME,"Display Name", "Icon","PanelPicture"],["unit", "unit", "unit"], "Vehicle"]
I found the definition of this array a while ago in a file, but I don't know in which file, I think it should be rewritten to include several vehicle variables