Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
as I currently built a Aquaduct in my capital provinse of sweden, curently the Empire of scandinavia but I would like to put my Cities of Wonders in upland but can´t as there is a aquaduct wonder in the way or let me build it in sodermanlands that right under uppland.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1755408585
Wouldent been part of the capital Duchies be enouth.
so yes where a massive project as a City of Wonder and where the capital at the time is can change or at least not the same though if you did build a city of wonder that would preatty much force move the capital to the new location.
becose let face it building the capital way up north as the Kingdom of Lapland (northern sweden/finland) is a tad silly especially if you had formed scandinavia or at least the modern Sweden or Finland as lapland... really you would move it a bit south if you could so that it wasn´t winter year round.
but yes only one City of wonder per relm I agree.
In regards to India, do you have any suggestions on which cities I could make a COW? I’m not very familiar with the region during this time period (769-1066) so I’m not sure of any cities that could qualify for a COW through either population size, development, or historical/cultural significance as a “Caput Mundi”.
And while I understand your point of Baghdad, it isn't really any closer to say Constantinople or Alexandria then Alexandria is to Constantinople, though I suppose Alexandria and Constantinople are separated by the Mediterranean.
Edit: Delhi and Bangalore might be good candidates. Both have several 'wonders' that exists both today and during the era CKII is set in.
a wonder to the city to make it a city of wanders. Also maybe remove the recuirement for the city to be your capital. Maybe as Byz you want to make Athens or thesalonica a city of wonder (or whoever you are make Jerusalem a city of wonder)
Again, it's something I might consider adding in the future. But in any case you would only be able to build a single custom COW in total, so flavorwise it would be best to build it in the capital.
One suggestion I might have, though it may just be me, I'd adjust the descriptions of some of the Great Work features/buildings in some of the existing COWs such as Constantinople to be in the "present tense", or reword them otherwise to sound a bit more "contemporary".
I've noticed a lot of the "historical" buildings/features, especially in Constantinople, tend to sound like they're describing them as we would describe them today, like in a history book, rather than how they may have been described in their time. For an example, I'd compare the vanilla descriptions for Hagia Sophia and the Theodosian Walls used, to some of the other custom buildings in the city. Same in some of the other historical COWs as well. Just sort of an "immersion" thing for me. Functionally, the mod works perfectly!
One other minor thing to throw out there is for the decision to "Upgrade Wonder to COW", I might change it slightly so it's abbreviated as "C.O.W." or some such, to emphasize its status as an abbreviation, or maybe just as "City", like "Upgrade Wonder to City" for the decision. Again, just a personal "aesthetic" thing, just think it looks a little weird seeing the word "COW" as is, but that's just me :P
I do agree with you that the varying tenses is an issue. Some of it is because I literally wrote down directly from the source while researching. But the key issue is that the descriptions is supposed to represent four different stages at the same time:
Before construction (1), after construction (2), after destruction (3), and after reconstruction (4).
In vanilla this was not an issue because all the wonder features were just minor upgrades in general, so there was no need for there to be any dynamic names or descriptions for any of the features. When I wrote some of the descriptions it was with the assumption that it would be possible to have the text be dynamic, which was not possible unfortunately. It might be possible for me to jerry-rig a dynamic system from scratch, but it would be a lot of work for little gain.
Also: Hey, I won’t tolerate any COW-phobia in my forums! You won’t ever know the true meaning of life until you’ve petted a COW.
(PS: Changing that text is such a minor fix, so it might take a while before it reaches the masses.)