安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
After a little exploring, a few tricky shortcuts strung together nearly cut my time in half, from 09:37.73 to 04:49:49 and jumped me from 46th to 2nd on the boards.
I know I can push it faster if I keep at it!
But using intentional FPS drops to intensify the broken/infected design, although a nice idea in theory, does not work. It makes it impossible to play on weaker machines and is just nullified by the massive computation power of newer high-end GPUs. (My GTX 1070 yields smooth and stable 60 FPS during the infected parts…)
Can you set a target frame rate in the editor, so that some parts are limited to like 10FPS on every machine? Then use this and keep this idea, otherwise it makes this otherwise great track unplayeble for those without a high-end GPU…