Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Well, actually, no. What you're describing are actions of a hero, not of a ruler.
Are you familiar with, say, Mass Effect? The protagonist, commander Shepard, did lots of stuff, including saving or dooming a couple of civilizations, brokering a piece between major superpowers and leading a war against an enemy on a galactic scale. Does commander Shepard rules the galaxy? No. He's just an awesome hero.
If you're unfamiliar with this... Pick any other fictional hero who did similar things. It's a fairly common trope.
Blackjack achieved great results without really ruling anything. Although she had ton of influence on actual leaders of different Hoof factions, and she probably could easily become the Hoof overlord, she did not. It's as simple as that.
So brokering peace between the Reapers and steel rangers, quelling the disputes between the society and the collegiate, building up Flank and Chapel. Taking the crown of the soceity, and then putting people in power to actually make that group work. Helping to establish the keepers as a uniter for the hoofington wastes( Remember, Trade saves the wasteland). None of those are "Building up and organizing an administative structure". She was pretty hard lining on the whole slaver situation. Sure, from her perspective she didnt conquer anyone. But that doesnt make her not a capable militiristic conquerer. And if oyu look at it objectively she conquered the hoof. The more we talk about this the less sure i am that you paid attention to what she put together.
Genghis Khan was not a mere military commander. He spent a lot of time organising and building up an administrative structure of his empire, managing relationship between lesser clans, working on terms under which conquered nation were supposed to exist from there on and so on and so forth. Atilla would be a better example of your point, he spent pretty much all his life fighting and pillaging and feasting. But we would not want Blackjack to be brought down to Atilla's level, would we?
Trust me, if back when I was working at this I would've thought of the way I could implement Blackjack in a way she deserves it that would be the first thing I do. I mean, she's the main character of the story! But I did not want her to be some kind of token, added just for the sake of it.
Leading a battle is not the same as leading a faction. At least, not in this game.
While it is possible to disable settlers for the player via one-city challenge there's no option to disable them for non-playable factions. The idea is that you may not only want to play these factions yourself, but also want to play any other faction while having these two as AI-players. And if AI-controlled Dawn or Zodiac is left without this settler restriction they may eat the whole map faster than Eater of Souls. They still can get more cities than player (since AI on a higher difficulty starts with up to 3 settlers - that's why I put more than 1 city name in there), but at least it's something.
Oh, I assure you I read PH whole (and even read its sequel - at least, chapters that exist). I think you and I just interpret the whole "Eater" situation differently.
I don't think that the Illuminati analogy is applicable in this. At least, not in a sence it's usually depicted.
While it is true that certain actions of Zodiac, Dawn and Cognitum were alligned with Eater's agenda they still acted according to their own free will and ideals. Some of their... ideas were probably in their heads due to Eater's influence but that does not undermine their own hard work and their own agendas, as villainous as they may be. And their goal was definately not the end of the world and whatnot. The only person who was an Eater's servant through and through is Amadi.
Look, I get it, Blackjack is awesome. No objections here. But back when I was working on this I did not feel like she would fit into a faction-leading role.
Also, there's the thing that I don't work on this mod anymore, so even if I agree with you I won't probably do anything. I kinda got bored, to be honest. If I remember correctly, I planned to implement The Society next, I might even have some files left from those attempts. But it was supposed to be led by Awesome, just so you know, not Blackjack.
Enclave and The Unity already exist in Malexlee1's mod. It's much better then mine, there're lots of factions, including NCR led by Littlepip.
Goldenblood's Secret Project is a gameplay workaround. It's impossible to get. Its puprose is to be replaced by Tokomare and Steelpony for respective factions and to be unavaliable for everyone else.
Oh, my... Well, while I ceirtanly agree that there are plenty of room for other faction I am still not so sure Blackjack fits the role of a faction leader. And although it is true that she's done a lot for the Hoof and it's by her actions everyone united and whatnot she never actually ruled anything, that is, on day-to-day basis, while Dawn and Zodiac did ruled with their factions. Even more so, they founded and dragged their people from nothing to... something. They spent years building and preparing their shady shit, so... yeah.
Eater maybe influenced them but they still acted on their own, they were not some kind of mindless shells.
Seekers are probably the best unit in the game. I think that has to do with a mod conflict, but I end up getting seekers before the great war infantry, and even if that's intentional its busted as fuck. Definitely not useless.
With all that said I do want to know if theres an Ini file setting i can change to allow settlers in non-OCC cities
No Blackjack since she's not a faction leader in the book, obviously. And, no, that one time with the Society does not count. *winky face*
Please, read the description. Settlers are disabled on purpose.
No, I think not. Seekers literally have the same stats as infrantry, they are just cheeper. Zodiacs may be a bit too powerful, but they are not avaliable untill the very late stages of the game (they replace XCOM squad), so they shouldn't be a problem either.
Plus, The Collegiate CAN play better I was mostly being a noob, I started by NOT building my city next to the ocean so no navel units for me, I was also playing with Barbarians Evolved and didn't annex any of their Rebel cities to expand; pretty poor playstyle on my part and I lost due to the Barbs having much more score than me.
Though I'll give The Collegiate another shot, I do love the fan art and want to get the end game stuff, it was just hard doing so because playing with Barbarians Evolved is like turning Civ5 into turn-base Dawn of War :p
Because of Deus, of course! The original Steelpony!
I thought it was pretty clever.
Beat them, and now, I have to play them.
And, they kinda suck, atleast before you can get the really cool endgame stuff, but otherwise it was still fun having an OP city :D
On a side note, why does project SteelPony have the Deus Ex icon?
Wow. That is... odd. Did you install this mod using the Workshop, or did you download the thing via a direct link and extract the files manually?
Because at least in the first case none of what you've described should happen. The thing is, mod files are placed in a separate directory, ergo, they do not interact with the main game files and, in theory, should not have any chance to corrupt your game. The game adresses mod's files only when you activate the said mod via game's menu. And when you exit the mod's menu the game stops adressing them.
So... I am at loss. And no, I did not update the mod since I first uploaded it, so the problem probably still remains... I honestly have no idea where I should even start to fix this. "I just don't know what went wrong!"
Sorry...
When i played a game with this mod activated the next time i closed Civ 5 would somehow corrupt the entire game file. Next time i tried starting Civ 5 (not the save, the game) it would crash in loading.
I do not know if this issue has been fixed by an update you did in the time sense I did this testing. (being about 6 months) I would be willing to attempt to run it but if there is any other way we could fix this without me doing another fresh instal would be preferable and appreciated.
Hi.
Can you please clarify what exactly goes wrong? Although, if an installation of this mod makes the game not playable, I'm sure it would have been reported much sooner, but in any case I need more information in order to determine the problem.
I was going to at first. As of now... Maybe. I dunno. Not likely in near future. Sorry.