Install Steam
sign in
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem






On Youtube 


Resale of game assets breaks the Copyrights instituted by Bohemia Interactive. Since Z&D makes a profit off of game assets, and there's no monetary gain given to BI, the mod violates Copyright Laws. It could try to claim "Creative Commons" and "Fair Use", but both are nullified because profit is being made off the mod.
WBK has a license from BI, legally, to make money off of his mods, because some of the money he makes goes back to BI. Ryan here, doesn't give BI money made from Z&D, thus is breaking the law. But please, internet attorney, tell me how copyrights work. Without trying lick the boots of Ryan.
This mod: Pathing sucks, the zombies suck, and there's so many other problems that loyal sheep won't bother to admit.
WBK's mod: Pathing works, the zombies are actually zombies, its fanbase aren't afraid to point out bugs when they present themselves. Plus the other options in WBK's mod are just added bonuses.
If I'm pathetic, then you're garbage. A bootlicker to a dead mod that is violating Copyright Laws.