Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In the quote, seems Mitscher is talking about how many carriers can practically be stuffed inside an escort envelop. He is working from three observations: (1) The number of needed to screen a given area of ocean surface is fairly fixed; (2) The supply of escorts is limited; and (3) Aircraft carriers need free air volume for operations. So you want to stuff the most carriers possible into an escort envelope to maximize the utility of finite and valuable resources, which is two to four carriers. If HoI4 modeled strike groups in any meaningful way in combat, this would be relevant; but it doesn't, so it isn’t. The USN and IJN all brought as many carriers as they could, three dozen to the Battle of Leyte, so they clearly didn’t think that more carriers over a target was a bad thing.