43
已評論
產品
1252
帳戶內
產品

charis 最近的評論

< 1  2  3  4  5 >
目前顯示第 31-40 項,共 43 項
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
2 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 0.5 小時
Trash, cringe, and a waste of my time. a good argument for Brexit. Not even worth writing a full review about.

1/10
張貼於 2018 年 12 月 3 日。 最後編輯於 2018 年 12 月 19 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
2 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 79.5 小時
A definite improvement over the previous game in the series, this game takes every aspect of Shadow of Mordor and improves each tenfold. If you are a fan of the previous game in any way this one is certainly up your alley. The expanded nemesis system makes for a huge variety of enemy types and the DLC expands that even further (if you're willing to spend the money). The combat is the same tried-and-true formula at the core, but with a bunch of different new abilities and finer details that lend themselves to greatly improving the overall experience. Graphics are good, the environment is gritty, menacing, and extremely fitting for a game set in Mordor. Definitely one of my favorite games of this past year.

9/10
張貼於 2018 年 8 月 5 日。 最後編輯於 2019 年 5 月 27 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
2 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 49.5 小時 (評論時已進行 45.2 小時)
One of the best puzzle/minor platformer-type games of this decade. if you are a fan of Portal or other titles like it, then this one is certainly for you. The gameplay has interesting mechanics that are introduced at a slow-but-sweet pace that allows the user to get acclimated pretty quickly. The puzzles are more often than not extremely challenging but also extremely rewarding. The story is one of the most philosophy-rich and well-told stories of any game I have ever played.

8.5/10
張貼於 2018 年 6 月 22 日。 最後編輯於 2019 年 5 月 27 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
2 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 4.8 小時
One of the best RPG maker games in my opinion, in terms of storytelling. The game has compelling characters and writing and the ending made me feel real emotions. the gameplay is typical of an RPG maker-esque title, similar to a visual novel -- however this does not detract much from the overall experience.

7/10
張貼於 2018 年 4 月 16 日。 最後編輯於 2019 年 5 月 4 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
3 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
2 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 2.9 小時
This game has nothing going for it at all. From the boring, uninspired gameplay, to the weird and annoying soundtrack that could've been sung by chipmunks, to the contrived story that never bothered to make any sense, it was honestly annoying to play and near impossible to complete. The subtitle for this game, "a game without mechanics" doesn't quite tell the whole story; what it should be is "a game not worth playing". To top that off, it also contains a healthy dose of ham-fisted SJW nonsense that made me groan when I read it. Just an awful experience from start to finish.

0/10
張貼於 2018 年 1 月 9 日。 最後編輯於 2019 年 5 月 27 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 395.4 小時 (評論時已進行 7.1 小時)
Tekken 7, the long-awaited pre-sequel to the DISASTER that was Tekken Duck-Duck Goose 2, is an even bigger dissapointment. The game features a wide array of costumes and collectable cosmetics (copying from Team Fortress 2), even going so far as to include an M16 item (but there are no sniper rifles for some reason.)

The gameplay is boring and gay. There are 4 (four) attack buttons, which is far too many. I really struggle to appreciate any game that has more than one attack button (like TF2).

Worst of all, there aren't any killstreaks -- and for me that is a key experience of any game.

I rate it -2/10.

張貼於 2017 年 6 月 23 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前尚未有人將此評論標記為值得參考
總時數 6.7 小時
Wow what a game! Cluster Truck (a play on words of the phrase 'cluster duck' -- the natural grouping formation of Mallards in the wild -- Google it, dummy!) is a shining example & becaon of hope for all Redditors who dream of making their own video game. As you hop from truck to truck, you contemplate why you are wasting your time playing a game with such a GOOFY gimmick, thinking, 'man i sure am having fun jumping from commercial vehicle to commercial vehicle!'

it has no killstreaks though unfortunately, which really detracts from the experience for me personally, therefore i really can only rate it 2/10.
張貼於 2017 年 5 月 27 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
3 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 290.9 小時 (評論時已進行 25.6 小時)
this game should be called ♥♥♥♥ ♥♥♥♥♥♥ 4 because thats what it is, just a big pile of those words really. there are no killstreaks for one, and the combos are all very extremely hard ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ and everyone online plays like a scrub and is worse than me and for ♥♥♥♥♥ SAKE if they just would play as good or better than me i could just ♥♥♥♥♥♥ beat them. anyways in the singleplayer u can play as ur favorite thug mine is jury because shes a ♥♥♥♥♥ and i luv ♥♥♥♥♥♥ and shes easy treyarch really dropped the ball on this one it is really just awful.
張貼於 2014 年 8 月 28 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
這篇評論因違反 Steam 服務條款被 Steam 板務封鎖。評論者已無法修改這篇評論。
428 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
2 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 1.1 小時
(評論內容已隱藏)
張貼於 2014 年 8 月 19 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
6 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
總時數 359.4 小時 (評論時已進行 163.4 小時)
penthouse side : 2 should be the title of this Treyarch title because it is literal ♥♥♥♥. there are no killstreaks for one, (1- ) and microsoft really dropped the ball by not letting u be a gangster in this one. the multiplayer in this game is a complete letdown bc there is no dlc, but onto the SINGLE player : you play as a grandma living in ancient rome during the roman emnpire ruling of rome era and due to the oppression from greek alexander the great you cant have sex with other old men and the entire game you go around collecting collectables and flying helicopters and there are no dogs like there should be as such in call of duty and the guns are unbalanced

9/11 it was the bomb gameinformer
張貼於 2014 年 8 月 15 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
< 1  2  3  4  5 >
目前顯示第 31-40 項,共 43 項