Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
I think these changes are very good. But I'd love to see you go much further with improving the way release dates are shown in general, also for games that already are released!
The main thing I'd like to see improved is that, for games that are still in active development (most importantly "Early Access" games), the one most important date that should be shown at the top, below the review info, should not be the date when the game was first put on Steam. Instead it should show the date when the game got the last major update. Because that is what actually matters to players.
Players should be able to see from this date if a game is a "2018 game" or a "2022 game". An Early Access game that was first put on Steam in 2018 but got constant updates since then is not really a "2018 game" at the moment, it's really a "2022 game", because the state of the game from 2018 likely has nothing to do any more with what the game is in 2022. Seeing the old date where a game was originally put on Steam, ignoring years of further development, gives people an incorrect impression and makes it way more work for players to figure out if a game really is an "old" game, or if its just a game that was put on Steam a long time ago but got so many updates that it's still a very new game.