ผลลัพธ์การค้นหา

30 fps and a crappy internet connection. You need either a psychologist or better hardware.

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Axis of Lint (ADG):

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Mexicola9302:

Yes a 45-65 kg woman or something can't drag around a 80-100 kg man, that also carries around heavy equipment etc. it's all complete nonsense. But the far left ppl really seem to believe that any of that would make sense.

Average weight of women is ~75-79kg in their 20s and 30s. Women in active combat roles would be different obviously and with more muscle mass in general (due to higher levels of physical training).

Saying things like this just illustrates how out of touch you are with the concepts you're discussing and/or your inherent bias.

(Average weight of men is ~85kg in case it matters. Interesting how you highballed that and lowballed women isn't it?)

Average weight of a woman is 75 kg, where in fat america?

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Grimmrog_SIG:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Scipo0419:

Alongside this is there are "Attacks" and "Spells". Not all attacks use your weapon (unless modified to do so). Trick Shot and Stomp are examples of "attacks" so they'll scale with "attack damage" but not "weapon damage". Trick Shot can be modified to use your weapon, Stomp cannot, neither are spells, but Trick Shot can be modified to be a spell.

trick shot can utilise wepaon damage if modified to do so, in that case wepaon damage should apply as well.

You mean exactly like how I described the skill in tbe last sentence of the post you quoted?

"Trick Shot can be modified to use your weapon, Stomp cannot, neither are spells, but Trick Shot can be modified to be a spell."

18

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Hoschi:

Someone please tell him that this is a truck simulator and we already have enough bus simulators on Steam. Then he'll save himself the time.

In all fairness, almost all other Bus sims are quite ♥♥♥♥♥

17

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย 󠀡󠀡:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย mikufanboy:

I agree. The Bright nights fork is a bit better in handling social affairs. Nonetheless, the point I was making is if you're not prepared to accept everything and anything this dev does to their game, you're gonna get buyer's remorse unless you can refund cause this dev will not accept your input under any condition unless they're in a good mood, since they're unstable like that. Buyers beware essentially.

Has Bright Nights ever imported the appliance system and pockets? I think I played it like 2 or 3 years ago and they still did not have it. Having to use the vehicle system to make electricity is really annoying if that is still how it works there.

TBH to main topic most devs don't listen to feedback so what you are saying is just business as usual.

They still haven't imported it. Not sure if they ever will but at least the NPC stuff like the exodii doesn't exist either.

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย TsampaD:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย oak:

You really should stop playing the game if it annoys you, there's probably a game or two out there you might enjoy more.

Of course I like them quite a bit, but I'll write my opinion on any title.

Sure. Which two games do you like? What's your opinion on them?

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย TsampaD:

As I wrote, the community forums are here for players like me to write about what they like about a game.

Great! What do you like about Starfield?

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย CH13F:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Some Kinda Kobold:

Battlefield has never had a particularly MASSIVE playerbase. There needs to be a middle ground between maps that are too small, and maps that are too big that no one is having fun because they keep being sniped. or spend 2 minutes running. Die. And have to start running again

surely it didnt take "minutes" running between objectives, there was always a some sort transport available, be it a brave transport pilot or lots of jeeps boats... ye we had naval battles and snipers didnt have the ability to 1 hit torso shot or such bs like fatal,so there was always a high chance a medic nearby whom could revive you if you meet with an unlucky headshot from 500meters. which is not possible anymore.

by that logic i surely wasting more time here running and waiting revive or redeployment screen until i reach an objective in bf6 due to bazillion rpm worth bullets from every angle raining or a pseudo zero skill sniper who plays peekabo 1 hit chest shot me.

Look. at the end of the day. if MAPS are the only reason 4 was better. Just ask the devs to add old maps.

They've already said fan favorite maps will be remade for 6. So likely they'll do some kind of Poll now and then when it's time for new maps. And let's say we get 2-3 new ones every large update. 1 will likely be a returning one.

And if that's the case. No reason to see 4 as better, right?

16