검색 결과

Lot of hassle, little benefits I'd say.

One issue with kernel-level anti-cheats if the fact that they are always running even if you don't play the game and there is people who don't like to see their ressources alocated to things they don't need or use (even if its less that 1%).
Of course you can stop it but if you want to play the said game you need to restart the computer.

Then there is the simple fact that some people don't like the idea of software running / messing with the deepest layer of their computer, being for security issue or simply, what if the anticheat break down for whatever reason? What about false positives? What prevent it from bricking my computer?

And let's be honest, cheaters are the biggest sweatty tryhards possible (if only they could spend that efforts to get better of the game...), they will do their best (and will succed) to find workarounds, so at the end of the day you gonna end up with an annoying anticheat and still a load of hackers.

I know, I don't have much alternative to offer, personally I just stoped competitive games overall because of that.

Marcus 님이 먼저 게시:

https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198339533079/images/

Oh that one, my default is to assume everybody is bad, and i don't play locked so i don't usually see these triangles.

And once you are zoomed in ready for the shot, they are usually outside of the optic, so my bad on that one.

Yea, i mean their disappearance should be a thing that happens in 100%.
I agree with this.

Dude shut up and just wait when the game releases, Stop acting like a goo goo gaa gaa baby dude, he just need some very rest of this game. My god every time you making post is a TOXIC, and for god sake if you wanna wait the game releases, JUST ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ WAIT THEN, FOR GOD SAKE.

Replacing Statue of Liberty with gold plated statue of himself is probably his next project.

freakklompje 님이 먼저 게시:

NaG1 님이 먼저 게시:

5 months to add card grading? surely that's not it

single dev, isnt that good at coding, took a break too. someone isnt looking in reality anymore here and it isnt us.

It's goofy that you think the consumers are supposed to care if he's good at coding or not lol... he gave a roadmap and gave expectations to PAYING, technically, investors... the ones who aren't a part of reality are the ones who think this Dev is their friend and are comfortable waiting years for a completed game while making excuses. that's delusional

Kobeth 님이 먼저 게시:

Excalibur(Fate) 님이 먼저 게시:

Tabletop is a useless comparison. A DM can simply decide that a level 11 party defeats a CR 23 boss because of 'divine intervention' or 'plot armor.' That doesn’t prove anything.
You can’t handwave outcomes with narrative excuses. CRPGs don’t get to rely on spontaneous miracles they have to make the power feel earned. That’s the fundamental difference.

In a proper D&D setting, this fight wouldn’t even happen until level 17+, possibly 20. At level 12, you’re expected to fight things like adult dragons, vampire lords, or beholders not godlike mind-entities that control the Astral Sea. The fact that Larian throws you into this battle at level 12 is pure 5e nonsense. It cheapens the stakes, insults the lore, and turns a supposedly world-ending threat into just another overhyped boss fight

Tabletop is precisely the most relevant comparison possible when it comes to what adventurers are typically expected to face in a lore accurate DnD adventure. The fact that an official DnD module puts a lvl 11 party against basically a demi-god archlich whose name invokes fear accross the entire multiverse says something about what DnD lore looks like. DnD content have always used plot devices in order to help give player characters an advantage, or at least even out the playing field, against threats way bigger than they are. I don't understand why it should suddenly become a problem because it's a video game.

Claiming that "tabletop is the most relevant comparison" overlooks the fact that tabletop gameplay prioritizes storytelling first, game mechanics second, and established lore last. In practice, Dungeon Masters regularly bend or ignore lore to suit narrative flow or player experience. Modules are designed for balance and drama, not for strict lore consistency. Therefore, using tabletop encounters as definitive proof of what’s “lore accurate” in D&D misunderstands the purpose and structure of the medium.

also you can add something like a struggling mechanic where a player has to complete a qte to escape the kill animation

EE_Amae 님이 먼저 게시:

PepsiCola 님이 먼저 게시:

Any words from the Devs?

We will add a big chunk of content with update 1.0, ie new biomes, bosses and the 3rd and final act of the story.

Hi I am curious if you can already tell if the existing content will change heavily?

To give an example of what I mean: if I already play the game now until the end of the current contet and the update drops: will I loose anything or have to redo anything?

e.g. Witchfire made heavy changes in its updates to progression. It was not necessary to start from the beginning but it felt better to get introduced to the overhauled progression and systems with a new save.

[H]
Butterfly Autotronic FN
Butterfly Vanilla
M9 Marble Fade FN
Karambit Lore MW
Skeleton Doppler Ph1 0.007
M9 Tiger Tooth FN
Skeleton Fade 91% FN
Bayonet Gamma Ph4 FN
Talon Marble Fade FN
Ak Fire Serpent Ft
Flip Doppler Ph2 0.008
Stiletto Fade FN
Flip Gamma Ph1 FN
Talon Tiger Tooth FN
M9 Crimson Web Ft
Skeleton Vanilla
Karambit Forest Ddpat Ft
Bayonet Marble Fade FN
Bayonet Tiger Tooth FN
Kukri Fade 98.1% FN
Ursus Doppler Ph1 0.009
Specialist Lt.Commander MW
Specialist Tiger Strike 0.26
Cobalt Skull Ft
Ursus Fade FN
Flip Marble Fade FN
Falchion Doppler Ph3 0.008
M4 Fade 0.007
And a bunch more skins

https://steamcommunity.com/tradeoffer/new/?partner=1114783321&token=faxMU4NI