Risultati della ricerca

I am done doing the public match on him.

Too much dumb players don't know how to fight him, basically doing no help at all. It is really a waste of my time soloing the 3x boss HP.

There is absolutely value in scouting ahead. If you are scouting 200 meters ahead, that is not called "scouting ahead" anymore.

Messaggio originale di sMash:

Messaggio originale di rin:

burden of proof falls on the accuser, they aren't AI upscaled until it's proven they are and they obviously at WORSE are debatable.

prove they're AI generated.

proof:

We’re making sure humans are involved. AI-assisted upscaling is occurring, but those are being done by artists who worked on the original material and have a good eye for each unit’s details and classic feeling.

source: https://www.gamewatcher.com/news/warhammer-40-000-dawn-of-war-definitive-edition-design-director-philippe-boulle-interview-mod-support-graphical-upgrades-online-infrastructure-and-more#:~:text=We%E2%80%99re%20making%20sure%20humans%20are%20involved.%20AI-assisted%20upscaling%20is%20occurring%2C%20but%20those%20are%20being%20done%20by%20artists%20who%20worked%20on%20the%20original%20material%20and%20have%20a%20good%20eye%20for%20each%20unit%E2%80%99s%20details%20and%20classic%20feeling.

Paired with poor quality control you get portraits like this: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3548970757

Looks great but wish it had a vr version

It's pretty funny imo. I don't give a crap about the ad but I love the mental gymnastics and cope by the people who are hating on her.

Messaggio originale di ominumi:

Messaggio originale di Kiririn:

Doesn't the low preset automatically select Performance upscaling? Or at least Balanced?

Also, 50fps low... You can run Elden Ring at 4k, actual native 4k, max settings and get near 50fps.

https://www.techpowerup.com/review/asrock-arc-b570-challenger/14.html

Nope I tried Elden Ring at 4k native. Was getting 46 FPS average. The sweet spot is 1440p on High preset. Though frame rate drops when there's lots of foliage around or lots of fire.

You said, "Nope" but then proceeded to essentially confirm exactly what I said...

Messaggio originale di jyor0385:

Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60Ghz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q SLI (8 GB Video RAM)
16 GB RAM
Windows 11
Installed on an SSD

First launch I was able to start in the cabin, but the pc shut down spontaneously when I opened the refrigerator. Since then, I have attempted to start 3 times. Each time the pc shuts down spontaneously at some stage during the linux-like startup screen.

I will try it on my other pc later.

Every few years this game is "on its last legs." Every few years there's also an expansion. Is there a connection or merely correlation?

Is there a level cap?

How long does it take to beat? Or is this infinite incremental similar to Shades of Rayna?

Messaggio originale di Sethioz:

Messaggio originale di Syntax Error:

some hotfixes later they give us 500 creds for o.ur patience, its not a dead game where the devs dont care, they can only do so much at once, give tripwire some time, well see this game bounce back in less than 3 months back to 20k players.

the game is good, the bugs may be bad, cyberpunk 2077 was the same way, and look at it now.

(edit) the game just needss time, yeah the bugs are pissing people off, and yeah it should say early access. but alot of games are released and it looks like cheeks, but after patience it turns up to be great.

... it's called bribing and it isn't working, i changed my review from positive to negative.
that last patch made performance even worse, kf3 has always been hogging my cpu 100% even in menus, but now not only i get fps lag, i also get some weird choppy input lag. performance has decreased a lot since last patch.

i've been patient and supportive, but if they release patches that make things worse ... then i can't remain positive...


explain this simple thing:
there's a similar game called deadzone: rogue, which is made by small indie dev team and also runs on UE5, yet it runs very smooth (no cpu or gpu hogging) and almost no bugs and it was released in early access, yet it resembled more like a full release.
KF3 is literally opposite, they have much larger dev team, founded in 2005, also runs on UE5, but performance is non existing and has lot of bugs. KF3 should be early access in its current state.

how do you justify KF3 running so poorly compared to deadzone: rogue?
if even a small indie dev team can make similar game run smooth, why can't KF3 devs do same?

glancing at that games thumbnails already tells me it uses small arena rooms for its gameplay. Pretty easy to optimize performance when it's using simple textures in small rooms with each combat encounter. Killing Floor 3 was clearly rushed into launch by higher ups, without setting the game as early access. This was a willing choice they made, and clearly it backfired. You can't compare indie projects to games made by bigger studios, they're working on completely different scales, smaller being MUCH easier to polish in the end. KF3 needs a good year of work with feedback from people like us.