Keresési eredmények

i don't know if i'd even wanna play it with arena players

but i guess at least on arena, people can't try to break rules and gaslight me about it lmao

From the trailer we can see a plenty of heroes we can play, different locations, but as for the enemy types, there are just 2?? I hope there will be more by the release time. I really want to play this game, played TMNT and SOR4 on release, can't wait for the day this game comes!

Which game studio has actually done that after achieving as much commetrcial and critical acclaim? CD Projekt Red? Bioware? Rockstar? Irrational games? Whatever it is you wish for I would doubt even you would have done if you were the head of a game studio that made a successful triple A game in the past 2 decades. You would have increased the scope and budget no matter how long it ends up taking.

リアンダ eredeti hozzászólása:

Tyvern eredeti hozzászólása:

GUYS I HAVE A GOOD NEWS TO ALL OF YOU! Warhammer 40K: Dawn of War Definitive Edition is available now! I recommend you guys purchase it. It is worth your money. Compare to this one. The developers of this game are retarded. Their CEO, is also dumb too. Period. Ban me? Who cares? If they do that, you'll lose another 11 players. :)

So what. I played that 15 years ago. I want something new.

And instead you're sitting on steam forums 24/7. I literally see your posts everywhere. It doesn't look like you want to play at all...

Razyel D'Ropa eredeti hozzászólása:

The game looks cleaner, better lighting and the path finding is better. Its definitely worth the 18 bucks or if you want to get into one of the best RTS then even 30 isnt too bad. Also whoever says that nobody plays this with mods seems to be a bit delusional

18 dollars for a patch is WILD.

MeUBastard *Malice* swamp.sv eredeti hozzászólása:

Wotca 7 eredeti hozzászólása:

NATO isn't strictly defined as a country so it's 'safe' and won't offend anyone. Using countries as factions is a problem because soft skinned nationalists would constantly get offended if they feel that their country isn't being fairly represented. And I think we all know where these people would be from.

Another thing to say with this, when it was a real faction, such as Russia and China, we got weapons for the faction that made sense, and vehicles. All of those have their own design language that was built into the game with love. I still remember the Chinese had the QBZ and I wanted to use it more but had to wait for a map that I could play as Chinese. The cockpits for all the Russian aviation equipment had that weird blue they like the plaster in their aircraft so much.

The US didn't have AKs, the Russians did, just as the Russians didn't have certain US weapons, just their own variants. I loved the diversity each team had and the uniqueness. That really seems to be missing from here, same as the camo. Each military has their own camo, in this game I can't tell you who's who without some red on the screen. These are bad design elements. They used to do very well with all of this, and representation for each side was good, no side was favored or any bias that I ever saw. No reason we can't do that today.

I somewhat agree. Games tend to get homogenised as they iterate through sequels. It was kind of fun that you could kill someone from a different faction in BF2 and pick up their gun to use if you preferred it. On the flip side, as you pointed out, it can suck if you don't get the faction with the weapons that you want. I kind of of miss it, but not enough to make me feel any kind of way about it.

I think I'm def big on that rewind update idea. :D Having alternative versions of all 8 areas sounds so cool! Though I hope that when the other update is added later, that THOSE enemies will also receive rewind versions? D: