Résultats de la recherche

Sounds cool :3

Pattern 647
0,50 float

The game continuing is great news, hopefully a new team doesn't bring a new vision though as I love this game as is. Was very sad to see what happened to Inside the Backrooms, they reworked it all to the point it feels entirely different and destroyed the vibe it had

necesito uno de los dos huevos para poder mulitplicarlos y sacar dinero

Kirinketsu a écrit :

W for the game, better to not have someone like you in the game if we judge you by the post you make, and if you did play the game how would you find the time to do all the hate posting you do with data and misinformation.

oh look who is back, the guy who plays this game as a daily job, the one who calls solo players ''unskilled'', did you really get hurt so much from my comment in the other post? I guess AGS is paying you to defend their game since I see you all the time whenever someone posts a hate a thread about this game lol go out and find a real job dude.

UE5 is the only reason I'm not buying this game on day one, you all know it's going to be an optimization disaster like every game made with UE5.

Tanoomba a écrit :

It's an excellent compromise for those for whom it is very important to play the pre-update version. It's way, WAY more than the vast, VAST majority of games offer as far as updates go.

It is not good enough, as it required people who bought into the original vision of the game to accept a technically inferior version. The game should have been branched instead - one for sensitive people, and one for those who appreciate the original vision.

Tanoomba a écrit :

The fact that you keep complaining about their rationale says the exact opposite. You care a LOT.

It is actually you that keeps bringing their feelings and rationale for changing the game into it, no one else cares. They could have done it to stop global warming for all I care, I just want the game uncensored and unchanged, like most people.

Don't give a toss about the reasons, unless they are complying with the law in my country.
*That* would be a forgivable reason for censoring the game, complying with the law.

Anything else is unacceptable.

Tanoomba a écrit :

They didn't.

You already have admitted that it is different from the original, therefor this is not an honest response.

Tanoomba a écrit :

]
Nothing is "diminished".

Not to you, no. You like the censorship, and agree with the reasons for it. Most of the rest of us do not, therefor in our eyes it is diminished.

Tanoomba a écrit :

Any creative decision made willingly and with creative intent is not censorship.

Except it was done long post launch, and according to many here, by a very different group of people. It was not even self-censorship, but rather the censorship of the work of others.

Tanoomba a écrit :

It wasn't compromised.

Not to someone like you, no - but most people do not share your worldview, Tan. They do not agree with censorship or altering the art of others, or even self-censorship, so they consider it differently than you do.

You do know that there are people who do not think like you in the world, yes? Do you think everyone *should* think like you?

Do you know that we *never, ever* will? You are not converting people with this activism, you are instead reinforcing their views, because they can see that your tactics are not coming from an honest, forthright place.

Tanoomba a écrit :

Of course I would have no problem with that. But they made it explicitly clear that that's not going to happen. And since they're no longer working on the game, it's now a literal impossibility.

At least we agree on something. Well, half anyway.

Tanoomba a écrit :

Still a straw man.

You just not admitted that it is not. Oops.
Also, that would not be a Stawman in any case, just by the way.

Tanoomba a écrit :

Those engaging in an outrage campaign, including several malicious accusations, demanding what they claim they are "owed", in an attempt to pressure the devs into going against their vision in order to accommodate the angry mob's personal political and moral values are pushing for censorship, yes.

Glad we got that cleared up. I will remember you said that.

Szuger a écrit :

RTX 4070 + i7 10700k in 1440p on ultra (gpu buffering enabled) and I get 70fps on average. In BF6 I get around 100 and in BF2042 130. Any tips before I uninstall it?

welcome to the club
13900KF / 4090 / 64GB DDR5 ram and my GPU is not even using half of the capacity, tried clearing local cache and config but that did not help, they are asking me now to fire up the system in safe mode with to additional services :) same as you no issues with any modern games, also made in unreal 4.x ...

mivaz a écrit :

GeneralRei a écrit :

Sorry i have no clue what shorting means so all of the walkthroughs/ guides don't make any sense. All of them talk about shorting without explaining shorting and it makes it impossible to use them. Hopefully someone will have a guide for me T^T

here is what short mean . u if the price high u short mean u borrow that price money the market pay u the money first so u got the money in the hand when the price drop u rebuy the unit u borrow at the high price u profit in drop section of stock . example the price is 10,300 u buy short unit max trade market pay u 1M and the next few day the price drop to 5.300 u have to sell short unit max repay the market only 500k so u profit 500k . so no matter the price go up or down u still profit.

I'm so sorry, I just don't understand this. How do I borrow and not buy? I only have a buy option? And I don't get where the 500K is coming from if the stock price goes down and I lose the money I put in. Are you able to give a step by step of what I should do separated out from the rest of your paragraph?