Résultats de la recherche

Play Wylder.

Draug a écrit :

I bet you at least one game you play has used AI, and they simply did not disclose it.

This potential but applied to books has resulted in me avoiding newer books.

Kat_Dunn a écrit :

I buy this game 6 days ago and it turned into a whole thing in our house. Even the little one desperate to play. So, little one plays on my laptop and has been playing solo and got herself up to 1600m. Yesterday afternoon she played chained to her brother for an hour. Later that evening she played again and her 1600m save was gone. Dates saves go back to when we first got the game but the recent game saves (The higher metre saves in the last 2 days) have all gone; the highest save was Hells checkpoint..... Has this happened to anyone? Is there a way to get the high saves back?

Hi,
Your save is normally backed up automatically via Steam Cloud, which handles backups in the background.
If needed, you can also manually restore a save by visiting this link:

🔗 https://store.steampowered.com/account/remotestorage

You’ll see a "Download" button next to each file, so you can download a specific save.
Once the file is downloaded, you can place it in the game’s save folder on your PC to restore it manually.

Feel free to ask if you need help locating the game folder or the save file.

Can anyone confirm the Quest 3 controllers no longer work in Elite Dangerous after the Vanguards patch? I even got that as an in-game message after starting it up the first time.

I used to play the game in the version (Horizons I think) before that "fps version" (Odyssey?) came out. Now on my new PC I reinstalled the game and it automatically goes into Vanguards. However the Quest 3 controllers no longer work.

Moko a écrit :

entuland a écrit :

We will not issue any refund

obviously, its not even the point its the fact that you treat the people that supported you when you were nothing but a free to play minecraft clone with such disdain like how dare I ask for something in return for the money I gave you, is what prevents me, and many many others from ever playing this game again.

I want to address this separately: I'm very sorry that you feel like I've been treating players with disdain, that's definitely not my intent, I try to be extremely respectful towards all players and I try to help everyone to the best of my possibilities.

You are free to express your opinion about the game and you have been free to ask for a refund, at no point I have written anything that could even remotely be interpreted as "how dare you" - all I did was to explain how you can still access all content (and possibly also the worlds you played on while they were hosted on our servers), nothing else really.

Could be killer VPNing. Have you kept an eye on the ping as you play?

phenir a écrit :

Craft4 a écrit :

There you have it - i have exactly 0 Acumen with that Energy Technician and it still gives me a warning and the bonus is bad as well. The bonus would be only 0,005 compared to 0,01 in the first row. So it´s neglectable?

Note the "total" in the description. This means it is counting all your crew for that stat. You have 767 engineering but also 1132 acumen coming from other crew. 767/1132 = .677 or 2/3rds of full power. Normally, you'd get 3.8% per point.

That math doesn't make sense. The divisor is 1,133 (it's actually 1 + total acumen), so the effectiveness of the ability is divided by 1,133. Without the divisor, it would give 1,133 times as much bonus.

The calculation right now is:
0.005 * engineering / (1 + acumen total) * points invested * crew skill
0.005 * 767 / (1,133) * 4 * 1.5
0.0203 = +2.03%

Without the divisor, it would be:
0.005 * engineering * points invested * crew skill
0.005 * 767 * 4 * 1.5
23.01 = +2,301%

To get that 2/3rds value, one would have to treat exactly 1 engineering and 0 total acumen as "full power".

All of the crew skills are multiplicative with each other (except warp core charge speed) but have a linear increase in additional investment. In other words, the more you put in one skill, the better the others become while the worse that one skill becomes relatively.
Think about it this way. Say you have 100 reactor power gen. The first point of the top skill increases it by 5%, giving you 5 more gen, while the bottom skill increases it by 3%, giving 3 more. Obviously, the top skill is better. But after investing 20 points in the top skill, your reactor power gen is now at 200. Investing another point in the top skill would give you 5 more power gen still but investing a point in the bottom skill would now give you 6 power gen, even though both skills still give their original percentage increase of 5% and 3% respectively. Now, investing the bottom skill is better. In fact, it became better a few points ago. However, once you invest a few points in the bottom skill, the top one will become better again. This relationship change will keep happening until you can't invest anymore because of the skill caps.

If the bonuses are really small, like the 5% or 3% per point, you might need to do this sort of math. However, as the bonuses become larger, the maximization becomes really simple: distribute the points as evenly as possible, completely ignoring the per-point bonus values.

Невозможно обновить игру, у кого так?

Espejismo a écrit :

Bernard The Gurnard a écrit :

Close the bloody thing It shouldn't have been made - garbage.

you control the threads you click on

Yes you are correct... and do you have a point? I clicked on it through my option to do so. Please explain if you can be arsded

Was hat man davon ?

Diese Höhlenkrabbler sind doch nicht ganz dicht im Kopf

https://youtu.be/jHi60uaHWzw?si=anL-5bwu-KvA0wk6