Resultados da busca

The two large expansions (Rise and Fall, Gathering Storm) are the big ones. Each adds major new mechanics and a good chunk of civs/leaders. Those are important. The expansion rules add a lot to the game, significantly changing how it plays.
Everything else is just ... more. A new civ here, some leaders there, maybe a scenario or a "game mode". Nothing that fundamentally changes the game, though some DLC civs can take things in odd directions.

Those small DLCs are the ones getting the poor reviews, and it's because if you're paying individually, you're not getting much for your money. If you find yourself liking the game and wanting more, wait until that "Anthology" bundle (everything) is on sale.

zeemods has a physics mod

Arcane mirror, Arcane shield, and Flameburst tome or Holy tome with arcane bell and the Marble Anvil set to trigger fast and give you a heap of attack power.

Can you not formulate a response without some idiotic Youtube video? Cant you think for yourself? Stop dodging the question, what do you think is written on page one here?
Does it not say that the NSDAP is to receive a large ammount of money, a donation from the Industrialist Verband infact?

There is a perma-death option but by default you lose attribute experience (and possibly levels if it goes low enough) and half your money, which you can go back and pick up. Also on default settings you can save/load I believe. I have only played with no manual saves though.

I thought it was Deltarune tomorrow.

cause that can lead to starting a very real war or lawsuit that will shut the game down. most games won't even use real gun names cause of lawsuits they could receive. either way real life gets in the way.

Escrito originalmente por Low Standards The Banished:

Escrito originalmente por Macronomicus:

Biggest launch ever for them, bigger than most game ever too, there's no reason to brag, or spread out numbers, they're not seeking investors, nor trying to placate haters, they see the numbers and they're doing even better than expected. The DLC seemingly didnt do as well as they'd hoped, but that will change over time, DLC have never been their big priority, that said, I love Shattered Space, its chock full of great content & really unique in the Starfield mix too.

I would like to debate this with you. Was the "biggest launch ever" because they released it free on Xbox and PC Game Pass? How do you explain the low owner approval rating on Steam based on their older games?

Not a big thing though and debating this would probably be a bad idea as I want to promote positivity. Just food for thought, maybe we can talk about it privately sometime.

Gamepass is not free, its actually more expensive than just buying the few games you actually play lol. Bethesda gets earnings with MS for gameplays within the gamepass ecosystem, also the game sells in MS store, not only Steam. By "biggest release" I mean in terms of profits & plays right out of the gate, as well as ongoing, Starfield bested everything prior, and will continue to. I would expect that ES6 and FO5 will also break records against their prior iterations too.

Escrito originalmente por Mask1992:

glint have been on BF since BF3 (If I'm not wrong) it is in the game to limit camping. without it everyone will only play sniper and camp on big maps.

and about there being only 1 good map for snipers it's because this is a beta. in bot weeks of beta we only get 4 maps, on full release we get 9 maps.

I'm all for methods to prevent camping, but glint the MOMENT YOU SCOPE IN isn't solving the problem of camping, it renders the entire class unviable. I'm all for glint, but not the moment you scope in, and not permanently.

I think after 3 seconds of scope, lasting for 3 seconds makes the sniper class more tactical, more decision focused, and not "HEY GUYS SHOOT AT THE LIGHT AND GET A FREE KILL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Escrito originalmente por Ontrix_Kitsune:

Escrito originalmente por Min:

I don't need RT but i understand someone who does need it , my biggest reason is i don't want to spend so much / have money for newest gpu's.. I can play all new games i want just fine 1080p if it's single player i aim atleast 30+fps preferable atleast medium settings..

Few examples, rdr2 , kcd2 two games which look almost perfect and today you can run them on ancient gpu's, if more developers tried CryEngine over Unreal one ( in kcd2 case)..

I have 2060 6gb and i'm not planning to upgrade any time soon atleast until i find one game i can't really play.

Unfortunately the choice is not yours to make as a consumer. There is no decision about if the end user wants it or not. Raytracing is the new graphical standard like DirectX 10, 11, or 12. Soon most new games will start requiring it to play the game and then at some point all games will require it.

Today there are a few games that require raytracing and most have it as optional but in the future gaming will change to all games requiring raytracing to run them.

Already today all video cards sold in the past 2 years support raytracing from Nvidia, Intel, and AMD. By the time all games start requiring raytracing the hardware will be fast enough where the performance hit to use raytracing will be negligible or not even measurable.

Exactly! Until Indiana jones we could choose if we want ray tracing ro not. And now we still can disable it in most games. But form now on they will release more and more games where there will be no option in the settings to disable ray tracing. It has not do about what we want and what we dont. While now there are only 2 games who work only with ray tracing cards there will be more and more until all games will need card with ray tracing.
Also as this article says here https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/doom-the-dark-ages-pc-performance-analysis-always-on-ray-tracing-isnt-a-problem-and-even-a-cheap-gaming-laptop-copes-just-fine/ if the optimization is good then ray tracing is not a problem.