安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
SteamOS is not efficient.
As for Ubuntu, I'm assuming that it's probably just as optimised as SteamOS as they both run Linux distros. But I can tell yo ufor a fact that Windows 10 is more effective and you will get 10-25% higher framerate.
Whether Valve is even able to actually maintain a Linux distribution is everyone's own guess.
Anyway, SteamOS is based on Ubuntu, it's a stripped down version of it optimised for Steam. You don't mention why you want to switch to it from Ubuntu, but it won't run your games any differently. It's just for people who want a simple way to run Steam. I don't think Valve pay too much attention to its upkeep because the last time I tried to install it a few weeks ago I had all kinds of problems and it seemed outdated and clunky. I'd say stick to Ubuntu.
Sorry, I have it installed on my PC and it gets much lower performance. Please don't say that it runs games the same when it doesn't. Ubuntu can not run most games unless you use some sort of bridge, such as wine.
SteamOS is on my second ssd partition, and I only get about 50 Average FPS on source games, and 40 on GTAV, yet on same settings II can get 60+ on GTAV and 80+ on source.
Now to add on, performance is not a big hit if you have Nvidia cards. If you have any type of AMD card no matter how good, it will flop. Valve has not at all optimised AMD like Windows can.
Because of actual driver support being in existence, Windows offers slightly increased performance with Nvidia cards, and SIGNIFICANTLY higher performance for those who went with AMD.
I will use SteamOS once AMD cards get more support, no matter how bad of a reputation they have.
SteamOS is also based on debian, not ubuntu.
they both use the linux kernel any i was just comparing it to what he already had.
Yes, Windows supports more games then Linux.
As for performance, it depends on the game being played, driver and graphics API that the game was designed around. Performance should be about the same for most of them that have native support for either OS or at the least, not enough diffrence to matter.
Nvidia has and supports Linux Drivers, as does AMD. As with any OS, you need to make sure you have the latest version to take full advantage of the card. Unlike Windows, Linux doesn't go out and update them for you.
As the driver are proprietary, I do not believe they can be included with a Linux Distrabution.
The main advantage is you get away from Windows and have more customizability and control over the OS. Other then that, the OS is smaller and uses far fewer resources. Resources now freed up for other use.
As for gaming, Windows having the larger library by far, is what makes it not worth changing to a Linux based OS at this time. Until developers make games for both platforms on a regular basis, it is better to stick with Windows.