Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
Being a realist comes with pessimism, but that doesn't mean that you can't be optimistic as a realist.
With any meta programming, the best choice is a balance, these are tools to use not religions.
Balance optimism, realism, and pessimism when it makes sense when using primarily optimism.
Read this part again...
yes, facing the possibility in a survival situation can i get food the answer is immediately no.
then apply thought and can weigh it up on probability of getting food and how to go about it becomes the process towards optimism without insanity.
even with a small chance, it's still a chance, it doesn't mean it's hopeless. eventually you'll find something after a little effort, thereby going through three thought processes together which ordinarily are opposite to each other.