Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Being a realist comes with pessimism, but that doesn't mean that you can't be optimistic as a realist.
With any meta programming, the best choice is a balance, these are tools to use not religions.
Balance optimism, realism, and pessimism when it makes sense when using primarily optimism.
Read this part again...
yes, facing the possibility in a survival situation can i get food the answer is immediately no.
then apply thought and can weigh it up on probability of getting food and how to go about it becomes the process towards optimism without insanity.
even with a small chance, it's still a chance, it doesn't mean it's hopeless. eventually you'll find something after a little effort, thereby going through three thought processes together which ordinarily are opposite to each other.