Installer Steam
connexion
|
langue
简体中文 (chinois simplifié)
繁體中文 (chinois traditionnel)
日本語 (japonais)
한국어 (coréen)
ไทย (thaï)
Български (bulgare)
Čeština (tchèque)
Dansk (danois)
Deutsch (allemand)
English (anglais)
Español - España (espagnol castillan)
Español - Latinoamérica (espagnol d'Amérique latine)
Ελληνικά (grec)
Italiano (italien)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonésien)
Magyar (hongrois)
Nederlands (néerlandais)
Norsk (norvégien)
Polski (polonais)
Português (portugais du Portugal)
Português - Brasil (portugais du Brésil)
Română (roumain)
Русский (russe)
Suomi (finnois)
Svenska (suédois)
Türkçe (turc)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamien)
Українська (ukrainien)
Signaler un problème de traduction
Being a realist comes with pessimism, but that doesn't mean that you can't be optimistic as a realist.
With any meta programming, the best choice is a balance, these are tools to use not religions.
Balance optimism, realism, and pessimism when it makes sense when using primarily optimism.
Read this part again...
yes, facing the possibility in a survival situation can i get food the answer is immediately no.
then apply thought and can weigh it up on probability of getting food and how to go about it becomes the process towards optimism without insanity.
even with a small chance, it's still a chance, it doesn't mean it's hopeless. eventually you'll find something after a little effort, thereby going through three thought processes together which ordinarily are opposite to each other.