Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
speaking of, br is X vs Y where as Y is a much larger number than X, asymmetrical?
i played csgo 1v5 regularly because of lowskill teammates, that would be asymmetrical?
by our world-wise knowledge book, wikipedia
l4d f.e. was (/still is) played 4v4
one reason why wikipedia fails. one dude just made this up and everybody else made their own fork for the term.
going by this, pretty much every damn multiplayer game - where not all players have the same set of tools, mechanics and conditions - would be asymmetrical.
speaking of every damn game, Asymmetric VR exists as a tag.
keep on tagging, maybe one day you get it in.
Left 4 Dead definitely makes sense for me - playing as the zombies and survivors in the PvP mode is distinctly different, even if the sides are even in players. I don't think I would generally consider differences in number of players anything to do with whether the game is asymmetrical, although certain types of asymmetrical game design might pit 1 player with certain extra powers/abilities against the rest of the players on the server, etc., but I don't see different numbers of players as essential.