Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
You're right it's not a technical limit. Feel free to google "online stores customer review" and read all the psychology and marketing behind it. The limits and way it's setup will be clear and easy to understand then.
TL;DR: the current setup is the most efficient at pushing/selling games. They don't want people to make a balanced, well informed purchasing decision, they want people to default to "buy it" most of the time.
If you want to write lengthy and exhaustive reviews, get a job doing just that or start your own site.
Ah i see - so it's a matter of marketing in the end. Ah well - I tried!
Ya, so use extremes from either end of the spectrum to make your point. If a person cant get to the point in 8,000 characters, they DEFINITELY cant do it in 15,000.
Some people get far too enamored with their words and style than actually communicating relevant details.
I personally would never read an extensive review, and personally, I look down on people that write arm's length reviews. It reflects a certain lack of order in the mind to me, personally; an inability to filter irrelevant details.
Might feel that way, but the conclusion is usually the same.