Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Best of luck out there in the wild
If you survive let us know how it go
A "dated" computer that works fine and can run every game, but where steam acts as the weakest link and stops working on it is not a good look for steam.
Cheering on creating more waste just to profit microsoft/dell/nvidia/google/etc by deliberately breaking old devices is not really a creditable stance as far as I am concerned.
I worked out years ago that you can get stuck doing the same thing over and over without thinking too much about it. So it's more easy to happen with hobbies and entertainment.
But you eventually find yourself unfulfilled.
This is why I always caution to look out for moments like looking at your games and thinking "I don't know what to play". If you EVER are thinking that, go do something else!
Because the real answer is "I can't be arsed to play ANY games".
I'm lucky in that I have a load of hobbies so it's a no brainer. But also be aware it doesn't matter how long it takes. Sometimes a few hours away is enough, and somtimes months.
IOne time I was away from Steam entirely for a few years.
You say that and Win98/ME/2K/XP/Vista/7/8 holdouts likely agree with you. And Steam doesn't really seem to have been harmed by end of support, so not a good look? Kinda seems like impotent posturing at this point.
I dunno, I guess I see upgrading as being a defacto part of PC gaming. Granted I'm biased. I build a new PC every 4 or 5 years and I'm not married to a 13 year old OS, so I'm just not in the perpetually outraged group.
Clearly you don't approve. But support always ends and holdouts will always be gobsmacked and outraged. They'll always be a tiny minority and they won't be able to stop progress no matter how opinionated they are.
I bought a game on Steam last week, or the week before...so, whatever.
I still sometimes wonder if she stuck to that Apple II until she retired, and honestly if she did, good for her.
at least with the c64 people are getting their hires
There's nothing wrong with doing that either. I would argue a few key differences being
A. those machines are from a different era, pre-Internet. The whole industry and ecosystem was different.
B. those users aren't using a dated system and demanding perpetual support from software and hardware vendors.
Arguably if you want to buy a PC and never upgrade it and use software locked into a specific year, that's fine, but that's the users scenario to manage. Blindly using systems that are constantly evolving and warn that system requirements may change over time in the SSA, that you must agree to before using Steam, is a big mistake.
I think the reality is most user opinions are one of inconvenience. And how dare anyone or anything inconvenience them. You can't use evolving systems but also expect your system to always be supported no matter how old it gets. No one is going to offer those terms, and expecting them, or assuming them just isn't anything close to reasonable.