安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Unchained adds a bit of stuff but requires a subscription if I understand it correctly. Else they are identical.
Both are run by Trion. Which translates into: overmephasize on monetization, horribly broken servers on the edge of crashing and no care about the game at all. (To be fair here, it's because of Gamigo owning Trion now, they themselves were fine).
The real question is how populated they still are. Unless you play with Koreans, I doubt there are much players left on either, the paid version most likely being even worse off.
---
Have you tried EverQuest II or Lord of the Rings Online? Both are fairly old, but are rife with content thanks to it and both still have a healthy population.
Neverwinter Nights is a bit more money hungry, but also fairly good.
If you don't mind paying
Final Fantasy XIV is absolute beast.
Elder Scrolls Online is also great. Technically it's free-to-play, but it feels horribly gimped unless you ignore crafting.
Guild Wars 2. Grindy af if you want best equipment, but also a great game.
FFXIV is one of them :)
i might have LOTR Online in there too but ill have to re-check
Anyway, going by recent reviews, it doesn't look like this change has improved much on the monetization side of the game...