安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Unchained adds a bit of stuff but requires a subscription if I understand it correctly. Else they are identical.
Both are run by Trion. Which translates into: overmephasize on monetization, horribly broken servers on the edge of crashing and no care about the game at all. (To be fair here, it's because of Gamigo owning Trion now, they themselves were fine).
The real question is how populated they still are. Unless you play with Koreans, I doubt there are much players left on either, the paid version most likely being even worse off.
---
Have you tried EverQuest II or Lord of the Rings Online? Both are fairly old, but are rife with content thanks to it and both still have a healthy population.
Neverwinter Nights is a bit more money hungry, but also fairly good.
If you don't mind paying
Final Fantasy XIV is absolute beast.
Elder Scrolls Online is also great. Technically it's free-to-play, but it feels horribly gimped unless you ignore crafting.
Guild Wars 2. Grindy af if you want best equipment, but also a great game.
FFXIV is one of them :)
i might have LOTR Online in there too but ill have to re-check
Anyway, going by recent reviews, it doesn't look like this change has improved much on the monetization side of the game...