Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
Unchained adds a bit of stuff but requires a subscription if I understand it correctly. Else they are identical.
Both are run by Trion. Which translates into: overmephasize on monetization, horribly broken servers on the edge of crashing and no care about the game at all. (To be fair here, it's because of Gamigo owning Trion now, they themselves were fine).
The real question is how populated they still are. Unless you play with Koreans, I doubt there are much players left on either, the paid version most likely being even worse off.
---
Have you tried EverQuest II or Lord of the Rings Online? Both are fairly old, but are rife with content thanks to it and both still have a healthy population.
Neverwinter Nights is a bit more money hungry, but also fairly good.
If you don't mind paying
Final Fantasy XIV is absolute beast.
Elder Scrolls Online is also great. Technically it's free-to-play, but it feels horribly gimped unless you ignore crafting.
Guild Wars 2. Grindy af if you want best equipment, but also a great game.
FFXIV is one of them :)
i might have LOTR Online in there too but ill have to re-check
Anyway, going by recent reviews, it doesn't look like this change has improved much on the monetization side of the game...