安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Valve doesn't censor anything, the developers choose to censor their game(s).
Something I don't enjoy because patching a game to uncensor it can land you in a lot of trouble if you also decide to upload screenshots.
But yah, blame the devs.
You can have explicit stuff and all. BBBuut your ratings have to reflecct it. And certain ratings automatically bblock your product from appearing to certain users, in certain areas, heck it can get your game bblocked from visibility and purchase in wholle countries.
So its an eqation.
Is the increase sales from uncensored equal to or greater than the sales that would be lost due to the greatly reduced audience?
Makny devs try to play the middle and release censored but sneak an uncensoring patch up on the interwebs . That way its not official game content, its a user mod.
The simple fact is that as already stated, the devs or publishers do this themselves. As to why, it's again as stated, usually down to ratings.
Many games go for multi-platform release so they often do this to standardise across platforms and so on.
In short, there's a number of reasons but it ain't usually Valve that has anything to do with it. So yeah, assuming censorship I know is a hot topic, but it's a flawed one.