Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
you don't actually have to install the games, as you can use tools that will run idle games that are not installed that you own.
^
Basically this, people love something to brag about when in reality nobody cares for such a thing.
All the "ability to review should be limited by playtime" threads suggest otherwise.
(And yes, then is when I keep saying that playtime is irrelevant)
Steams backend can safely handle up to 32 games at the same time being their playtime recognized. anything more and it might bug out.
32 x 24 = 768 hours per day.
x 14 = 10752 hours per 2 weeks (that is the most you will find on recent playtime on a profile)
or
x 365 = 280320 hours per year
and you will have your million hours played in about 3 1/2 years.
and you PC does not need to be any powerful. you do not need to start the actual game. Steam just needs to know the game is running and you can simply tell it what is running.
this is neither "spoofing" nor "cheating". the premise for malicious intent or gaining benefit is not given, there is no designed competition for playtime. this is "simulating running games on Steam".
simulating running games has been a thing since Steam community profiles were very basic and this:
https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Steam_rating
was the only indicator of your playtime activity.
playtime back then was not recorded or saved per game, it was general and not saved for longer than rolling 2 weeks, also buggy. per game and saved came later.
as other said, playtime is pointless. if people take it up for competition on external sources is not relevant.
this even with running all the games you can it takes a ♥♥♥♥ load of time. Most people end up doing it but running afk games along side the real game they are playing.
Well yess that's why we have a Guinness record for the longest hair in the world.
But it's still irrelevant.
Pretty much, I love being a time wizard.
But for real, it's just spoofing their playtime by using 3rd party Software that tells Steam you're playing, so & so, and that's about it.