安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
That's a silly idea. It's NOT THEIR product to change.
So not only legally is that a problem but also it's not their prerogative as it ain't their error.
Eisberg isn't asking for Valve to change the developer's product, Eisberg is suggesting that Valve to change their system to accommodate a single game.
Faor enough then .... except that's even more ridiculous.
That's just incredibly silly. To propose EVERTYHING changes because out of the THOUSANDS of games that have ever appeared on Steam, only this example is known to have cropped up you've got to throw the baby out with the bathwater .... just no.
Agreed. That was my same argument.
But that's not a steamworks problem. If the game executable says "hey is steam running" and steam goes "yep im here" well thats pretty much working as intended. Steamworks doesnt know that its being 'laucnhed from epic'.
... more and more developers not creating an .exe for different platforms? That again, is on the developer and is not a reason for Valve to change anything on their end.
If anything, it would be more of a reason for the developer to do DRM free on all platforms, if they don't want to make multiple .exe files for their game.
Yep, exactly.
They could also encode it to check for epic launcher first, then ignore the Steam check if found, but then it may trigger Epic if ran from Steam.
No matter what direction it goes, it is the developer who makes the decision.
Why exactly should Valve change things when a dev is trying to cut corners? Wouldn't that be up to the game dev to change their coding?
If they want to integrate both Epic and Steamworks, they should just make the Epic version launch with command line paramaters that force the Epic APIs to be run. Its definitely doable as I know another game that forced teh launcher to run a specifci batch file to run the game (due to some fun whackiness on Unreal Engine)
Note of course the game code itself has to understand "yes please use the Epic APIs" instaed of the Steamworks APIs. but you're gonna hae to be doign that anyway
No it absolutely shouldn't. That's really flawed logic.
"You can see" it happening more and more .... really? Demonstrate evidence for it. Show us good solid data that shows this is going to be a consequence that devs will either mistakenly do, or deliberately do for some reason.
The fact that Epic has been out some time, and this isn't their first game on there, demonstrates it ISN'T a problem and this is an isolated case.
Then you have to demonstrate why you think ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ all over the users that want to use Steamworks as they wish is a viable reason just to stop this alleged problem that you have yet to demonstrate.
You see the problem?
How long ago did you purchase the game?