Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
A rather big case of "culture shock". Before porting the game, one should definitely do a cultural background check. Numerous cultures treat sexual themes very differently and the age of consent is varying from country to country. Touchy topic, to say the least.
also nothing is banned, just rejected from one single storefront. there are dozens of other stores for such content. Valve just runs Steam on a global agenda, where such content can end in lawsuits really quick ... and i guess Valve has had enough being the headliner for stuff that is done by 3rd parties.
Valve can run their store however they want. the devs should be glad that they get at least an explanation now why it was rejected and literally nothing prevents them from changing their content to still release their products on Steam.
i mean if you make a story based game ... the sex scenes should be able to be cut down easily and you still have 90% of the content left, if not, then the priorities were probably not that much on the story.
Guess he wanted a bit more than "because law".
Which makes sense. Murder is a crime but depiction of murder is still ... fine? At least it's a whole lot more relaxed than anything involving minors. Sexual or violence related.
Fun fact: Star Wars Episode 1(?) is missing a second in the French version where Boba Fett's father is hittinghim with his helmet. That's how strict child protection laws can get.
I don't even remember any father/child in that movie -- even Darth Vader / Luke was revealed later, IIRC.
*However*, cuts like this may or may not have a legal requirement behind them. Sometimes they just made to be on the safe side, without having to go through courts and possibly get instructed to remove the scene anyway.
Which, while it makes sense from a business perspective, is kind of bad since it strengthens censorship: companies censor themselves to be on the safe side, so these laws are never even challenged in court, possibly going all the way up and getting them declared unconstitutional (I'd love to see that happening to the German law that forbids fighting Nazis in games, allowing Steam to cite legal requirements for their brutal enforcement of censorship on games like Wolfenstein).
Admittedly, the legal age (as in "it's not legally defined as pedophilia") in Japan is 15. But we're (well, most of us anyway as well as Valve's legal place of residence) not in Japan here.
So it's much like any popular medium. Churn out large quantities of what sells best and take minimal risk for high profit. But what flies in one culture doesn't fly in some others, which is what the creators obviously disregarded and it came back to bite them. Perhaps that'll cause at least SOME of them to break away from the mentioned high school setting.
Popular uniform fetishes are high school, french maid and cheerleader outfits. Two of them can be justified with a high school setting.
People who try to say anime/manga characters look certain age are idiots .
Only part that resembles human is their body .
And if a highschool cheerleader moonlights at a Maid cafe then you basically got your trifecta.
Seriously though OP. Did you ever consider that the devs might actually be bending the truth to paint themselves in a more sympathetic light. You know like how howHow a pickpocket will say
"Oh I found that wallet on the sidewalk officer and was looking around to retrurn it to the nice gent what owns it I was."
Look. There are VNS that actually have explicit animated sex on Steam. They are still there because guess what the devs made damn sure to apply proper ratings and warnings to that ♥♥♥♥.
Well it would fly in this culture no problem, if overcriminalisation was not a thing. Read up on it, there is literally enough wague laws on the books to literally get every single member of the populus for something (except toddlers) in to jail if everything was enforced to the letter. In an enviroment like that what kind of content cant be called legally gray?
You guys are comfortable throwing the content under the bus when its conveniently out of your interest, but how long until GTA will be banned? After all it has plenty of glorified criminal activity in it. How long until anything vaguely interesting will be cut?
Remember this is a tactic. Censorship uses the fringe sexuality and think of the children rethoric as the thin end of the vedge! Once its gained purchase they will not stop hammering on it and through that opening they will reach for ever more and more.
This is - with a strong lead - the most idiotic argument I've seen so far.