Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Battlefield's movement and charging and stuff is brilliant. That's something it has over HLL.
But if BFV bores you because of how little teamwork is required, then the choice is clear.
For example; HLL released Omaha map this week, but DICE is still releasing crap exotic maps like Fjell, Aerodrome, Narvik, Hamada, etc. They're losing their playerbase and they put a new Metro map (Operation Underground) which made the BF3 so popular. LOL! BFV has negatively impacted itself.
WW2 is the Battle of Stalingrad for me! WW2 means the Battle of El Alamein, Moscow, Berlin.. WW2 is the Battle of the Bulge, Gazala...
One day, if they remake BF42 with Frostbite engine, it sells like hotcakes.
BFV = #notmybattlefield
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWGil9ZCCD0
Robin
Save time and watch the bashing on youtube.
relying on youtube. bestest idea in the internet.
BF5 is faster paced and really lets you do absurd ♥♥♥♥ - and while HLL isn't a super hardcore game it is significantly more realistic. So it kinda comes down to which style of game you like more.