Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That said you also don't need to rely on Claw as your only damage source. If you wanted you could get a few Cold Snaps in the meantime and get some passive armor generation going. Run a tight ship/deck.
So yeah claws are really bad atm.
Ofc I'm talking about a near pure claw deck,
someone is confusing streamline with genetic
on topic I ran a deck with 2 claws 2 hologram plus and a rebound
was pretty great. one of my easiest wins. not much else spectacular in the deck either. then again it was a kunai run so I was basically invincible after a while.
Correct. However, it being an attack that scales uniquely no matter how many you have and can be played multiple times in one combat fits the bill of what they were claiming more than genetic's single use per combat defense. I honestly have no idea how genetic was even thought of as something they may be confused about.