Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The players play as a group, it's not a game mechanic.
But the problem is that when building teams, the front-end balancing ignores level completely. It out to take other higher level player who are not in the stack and put them on the other team. Because, contrary to what Estaban said, rank does matter. It's not an end all be all, but, generally speaking, a level 300 player is better than 50. Not every time, by any means, but it would be a very simple, easy guide to build better balance into games at map start.
As a player who has +500 hours in the game i agree with this, Levels just a status about how long you've been playing this game, but i cannot neglect about how one squad wiped out inexperienced or newcomers in a single match, i've been playing frontline and push mode A LOT, everytime i saw opposite team has a +500 level in a squad i know how its gonna ended, and for me it is Unbalanced.
Then we could balance ourselves.
you might not be that good, or at least you say that. maybe you just want to have fun with strange builds etc.., what do i know.
but the one thing you got, when you played for such a long time is map knowledge.
that is huge...