BRING BACK AN-94 IN GAME!!

[ユーミ]

ak74 /ak74u was made to use 5.45 mm after soviets found out 5.56 was actually more lethal against humans in cqc than 7.62.

akm and ak47 tho. the difference in making them in factory, more or less the industry level.

ak47 was made with milling but akm was made with steel pressing, which is more easier and cheaper to mass produce. so basically ak47 and akm is the same thing.
but akm is cheaper. Anyway.

AN-94 was a follow up gun to replace the ak74 in 1994.

it used 5.45 by 39mm. Using a long recoil style and a feeder, it could fire 2 burst really fast.
it also used rails, and made long range fire easier with western style iron sights.

it was used by spetnaz and some field army cuz it was selected as army weapon in 2000s.
but cuz soviet collapsed to russia, they couldnt fund the gun to be widely used.

but still, it kinda got adopted here and there after ruskies started to militazed again.

so next update an-94 might get added cuz why not. its being used still nowadays and makes more sense than ISIS using QBZs and QTS

[A Table]

Originally posted by SE:A:

.so next update an-94 might get added cuz why not. its being used still nowadays and makes more sense than ISIS using QBZs and QTS

Are you sure about that? The QBZ-97 is an export variant of the chinese QBZ-95, which has an estimated production run of several million rifles.

Meanwhile, the AN94 barely sees use in the country it was designed in as the AK-74M is considered the better rifle in the russian army, which indicates that production numbers are rather low(possibly a few thousand?).

I don't mind you fantasizing about the AN94 in this game because it a fun gun to play with in video games(BFBC2 comes to mind for me personally), but it would suffer from the same syndrome that the QTS-11 and AS VAL have; it doesn't fit the theme of the game. Doesn't ISMC have it by any chance?

[ユーミ]

Originally posted by A Table:

Originally posted by SE:A:

.so next update an-94 might get added cuz why not. its being used still nowadays and makes more sense than ISIS using QBZs and QTS

Are you sure about that? The QBZ-97 is an export variant of the chinese QBZ-95, which has an estimated production run of several million rifles.

Meanwhile, the AN94 barely sees use in the country it was designed in as the AK-74M is considered the better rifle in the russian army, which indicates that production numbers are rather low(possibly a few thousand?).

I don't mind you fantasizing about the AN94 in this game because it a fun gun to play with in video games(BFBC2 comes to mind for me personally), but it would suffer from the same syndrome that the QTS-11 and AS VAL have; it doesn't fit the theme of the game. Doesn't ISMC have it by any chance?

NO

[A Table]

Aight, fair enuff

[Can 'o' 🅱️eer]

So? АН-94 weighs as 7.62 rifles, has some cleaning issues, and pretty prone for dust. It makes sense only for SOFs to use them, and NO, Russian SOFs don't use them
E N O U G H with these spam posts ok? where is moderation?

[Karabina]

yeah AN94 good gun but if it come it must be for the security advisor not insurgents

[ユーミ]

Originally posted by SeregaUser:

So? АН-94 weighs as 7.62 rifles, has some cleaning issues, and pretty prone for dust. It makes sense only for SOFs to use them, and NO, Russian SOFs don't use them
E N O U G H with these spam posts ok? where is moderation?

your logic is not valid cuz you are basically saying all the weapons in the game from welrod to VHS does not have any cleaning or dust issues to them lmao.
some weapons are prototypes, some are not mass produced, some are not fit in middle east settings.
this game is not mil sim realism simulator and the an-94 fits the atmosphere of modern warfare so why not?

[Can 'o' 🅱️eer]

Originally posted by SE:A:

Originally posted by SeregaUser:

So? АН-94 weighs as 7.62 rifles, has some cleaning issues, and pretty prone for dust. It makes sense only for SOFs to use them, and NO, Russian SOFs don't use them
E N O U G H with these spam posts ok? where is moderation?

your logic is not valid cuz you are basically saying all the weapons in the game from welrod to VHS does not have any cleaning or dust issues to them lmao.
some weapons are prototypes, some are not mass produced, some are not fit in middle east settings.
this game is not mil sim realism simulator and the an-94 fits the atmosphere of modern warfare so why not?

you don't know why weapons should be reliable do you?
АН-94 is really prone for those problems like L85A2 but bri'ish rifle at least makes sense for this conflict

[ユーミ]

Originally posted by SeregaUser:

Originally posted by SE:A:

your logic is not valid cuz you are basically saying all the weapons in the game from welrod to VHS does not have any cleaning or dust issues to them lmao.
some weapons are prototypes, some are not mass produced, some are not fit in middle east settings.
this game is not mil sim realism simulator and the an-94 fits the atmosphere of modern warfare so why not?

you don't know why weapons should be reliable do you?
АН-94 is really prone for those problems like L85A2 but bri'ish rifle at least makes sense for this conflict

this game does not take into account any 'gun problems' from cartridge cases/shells not ejecting properly or spring messed up or anything else.

just bcuz an-94 was maybe not the best reliable gun in real world doesnt mean it cant make it in the game.

why are you even coming with that reliability stuff. this game is not squad or tarkov milsim.

its sandstorm. the game does not take accounts of the reliability problems.

[ユーミ]

if you are so interested in 'irl gun reliability' please go play arma or squad. afaik, sterling in game had issues like the gun may fire by itself and some security guns are very prone to jam. you never said anything about those gun being in the game but somehow an-94 cant?

[ユーミ]

Some maps have rivers in it. Why don't you go all the way to 'realism in real life' and say some guns in game should not even fire properly after you go crouch or prone in the river there? jesus all these military otakus and their 'oh its not realistic' logics

[Can 'o' 🅱️eer]

bruh i dont see any arguments against my statements
and yet you cant just add a gun to faction, we need a counterpart for other faction and some kind of an explanation for it
we already had DE outta nowhere, we dont need another thing that wont make sense

[ユーミ]

Originally posted by SeregaUser:

bruh i dont see any arguments against my statements
and yet you cant just add a gun to faction, we need a counterpart for other faction and some kind of an explanation for it
we already had DE outta nowhere, we dont need another thing that wont make sense

ak12

[drambdauði]

Honestly I really enjoy russian weapons, so an-94 would be welcome, but spamming 3+ posts a day isn't exactly the best way to go about it.

Personally I'd love the ak-12 and ak-15 and perhaps the ak-19, but I'd be fine if the ak-12 and ak-15 were just reskins of the ak-74 and akm.

[La Escopeta Infernal Conji]

Is this guy dumb or something

[TAMA たま]

ah sht the AN-94 aut*sm again

ayy bruh if you want an AK with burst firemode the AK 103-2 is more realistic, do your damn research because you cope so hard that you even contradict yourself

Originally posted by SE:A:

so next update an-94 might get added cuz why not. its being used still nowadays and makes more sense than ISIS using QBZs and QTS

If you want it sooo bad play stalker or MW19 idk is a cool gun tho