Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
IMO It's good as it is and shouldn't be changed.
You still have the option to shoot the commander in the head if you and your team think he's not doing his job, this is already implemented.
Tho if the commander is fast enough to regret him/herself, they have the option to direct the airstrike elsewhere before the command is confirmed by station.
Then play Rifleman? Same exact loadout options except, guess what!? No radio and no responsibility!
I am trying very hard to tell why people dont stick around commander and you plain and simple answered what most people do when call out to be not a good observer GREAT CALL!!!
I have no idea what you're talking about other than the fact that you simply can't play the role that your class is designed to be.
I don't play rifleman even thought that was what i played from the start. But we had many game without radiomen so i thought this would be good to mix radio with rifleman but it isn't. You have no option but follow like a dog one person on the entire group of squadron. This is absurd. Observer if i follow your logic (&game design for that matter) will be the worse class to play with.