Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1707964551
Idk where you got the idea that it does from unless you mean when you're playing COOP and the AI 1 tap you from super far away with a makarov, that's how they've always worked, they just headshot you after looking at you for long enough.
No I am not going to be idiot and try to back my point because I have nothing to back it with. This was just an opinion. Thank you for the chart.
It is also perfectly feasible to survive multiple shots from either of those rounds. Albeit the likely hood of surviving multiple 7.62x54r rounds is not all too likely especially if hit center mass, which would certainly be a one shot scenario 99.999% of the time. I'm sure there has been a lucky ♥♥♥♥ to survive that or unlucky depending on how you look at it.
I would appreciate if the SCAR-H got a slight buff. It is arbitrarily weaker than the other 7.62x51 guns for no reason other than, I assume, the fact that you can equip it as the advisor. Really, I think they need to slightly normalize the battle rifle damage values. It seems like while the FAL will 1hk people pretty frequently, the SCAR-H never does, and the G3 is pretty hit or miss.
Other than that, I think point tweaks would be enough compared to actually changing weapon stats. For instance, the PKM is WAY too cheap for how good it is compared to the M240's price and the M249's lack of stopping power now that the M249 has had its AP rounds removed. Seriously, the PKM is basically a 100 round Mosin Nagant, and it's cheap enough to run in whatever setup you want with a heavy carrier. The MG3 has the novelty of high rof, but imo the PKM is the king of the current LMGs and it's tied for cheapest of the 4. The M240 suffers from a horrificly high price and the firing delay to ultimately be not quite as good as the PKM, and that's the best Security has got.
Thats the British made FN FAL - Semi Auto only the L2 is full auto/semi auto?
Seems a little odd as it lacks content and it only needs a sound file, weird.
FYI LMGs are usually being chambered in intermediate cartridges (5.56×45mm & 7.62×39mm), which means that currently only M249 is the legitimate LMG. The rest are GPMG (General Purpose Machine Gun) which blend the functionality of MMG (Medium Machine Gun) while having better portability like LMG, plus being chambered in full-sized cartridges (7.62×51mm & 7.62×54mm).
Try to put compensator on those big boys whenever possible. I tried to put that on M240B at shooting range & goodness, its horizontal recoil is reduced into 30%, which makes the shooting less “Shaky” when in ADS. Plus, the new GPMGs are using AP rounds to increase their effectiveness. Also, I think that MG3 has more higher penetration than PKM due to the aforementioned reason, despite the difference of the muzzle velocity is merely 5 m/s IIRC (M240B has better penetration & muzzle velocity than both of them in 853 m/s, though).
Rifle, 7.62 mm, L1A1 (SLR)
Based off a FN FAL but made in Britain and the common wealth.