Black camo?

[NPC]

So I was wondering when they would add black camo. It is pretty universal and would fit the game. Plus I want to make asthetic looking guy so black camos would be nice

[Sin Eater (𝕸𝖆𝖙𝖙ツ)]

please add this nwi

[Maki Nishikino]

They removed it for a reason I think.

[[57th] AngryHatter]

Cheat much?

[NPC]

Originally posted by Maki Nishikino:

They removed it for a reason I think.

but can they just add it back in. I dont see why it would need to be removed to start with

[Goat Walrus]

Security forces never had any black camouflage.

Insurgents however did have access to black colored clothing items and solid-colored keffiyehs.

What typically happened was that insurgents would routinely create blackout uniforms to make it easier to hide in shadows, not entirely dissimilar to the game's current bomber skin.

It was eventually deemed to be too powerful for insurgents and removed.

[NPC]

Originally posted by Goat Walrus:

Security forces never had any black camouflage.

Insurgents however did have access to black colored clothing items and solid-colored keffiyehs.

What typically happened was that insurgents would routinely create blackout uniforms to make it easier to hide in shadows, not entirely dissimilar to the game's current bomber skin.

It was eventually deemed to be too powerful for insurgents and removed.

IT IS A CAMO how is it too powerful? And why not give it to both teams instead of removing it? It is supposed to hide you its a camo that is the point of them. And black in a desert for the most part is not ideal most the time so I still dont get why it was removed.

[NPC]

So will they add black camo back in for both teams? Otherwise they should remove tan becasue it is too op and blends into well with sand.

[NPC]

?

[Favkis Nexerade]

Originally posted by ÚwÚ:

So will they add black camo back in for both teams? Otherwise they should remove tan becasue it is too op and blends into well with sand.

Yeah I agree, that's weird logic. You can be fulyl tan, even cover your face and hands, while insurgents have to wear beige pants and being camo.

[NPC]

Originally posted by Favkis Nexerade:

Originally posted by ÚwÚ:

So will they add black camo back in for both teams? Otherwise they should remove tan becasue it is too op and blends into well with sand.

Yeah I agree, that's weird logic. You can be fulyl tan, even cover your face and hands, while insurgents have to wear beige pants and being camo.

Its a big fallacy. Both teams should get black camo or we should all wear neon

[Coldsteel]

Originally posted by ÚwÚ:

Its a big fallacy. Both teams should get black camo or we should all wear neon

False dichotomy is a fallacy too.

[chimken]

They really need to reconsider their clothing options on both sides. The original Insurgency did well enough separating the teams by tan vs. olive/black... Was giving SEC all the earthy color options and having INS use rainbow colors the best option?

[AldrickExGladius™]

Been wondering where the black is too

[Sanity]

Originally posted by Maki Nishikino:

They removed it for a reason I think.

Too much friendly fire lol

[NPC]

Originally posted by Sanity:

Originally posted by Maki Nishikino:

They removed it for a reason I think.

Too much friendly fire lol

Okay but friendlys have arrows on their body and the clothes are different enought that color should not matter. If this is supposed to be a realstic shooter then enemy with similar camo is part of the battlefield and people should check fire. But it shouldnt matter anyway cause friendlys have big arrows on them.