Insurgency: Sandstorm

Insurgency: Sandstorm

View Stats:
Sam Fisher Aug 5, 2019 @ 5:59am
Why not add security Ak-74?
I would suggest giving another team the opportunity to take the ak-74, as I know people from the regular army have access to these weapons, and they use it widely. Take the woman for the preview of the game, she had the Ak-74, and I think it will be widely used in the same way as the rebels.
< >
Showing 1-15 of 36 comments
Lazo Aug 5, 2019 @ 6:05am 
Hmm, maybe an ak-74m with polymer furniture.
JustRyan Aug 5, 2019 @ 6:24am 
Insurgency Sandstorm REALLY needs to add weapons and attachments that can be used for BOTH factions.
The M9 for example or even an M16A3 and for attachments, the ACOG
Last edited by JustRyan; Aug 5, 2019 @ 6:25am
ado Aug 6, 2019 @ 8:09am 
I think Security would be better with an AK-12, since it's an actual modernized military firearm

also, the woman in the preview is a kurdish freedom fighter, she was supposed to star in the campaign, which got cancelled for various reasons
Favkis Nexerade Aug 6, 2019 @ 9:13am 
Female on preview have akm. Also preview is misinformation. There is no even good old G3, only mutant version with stupid rail. Their preview is clickbate to make you think there are actually good unmodded weapons, but in game it's always retarded TACTICOOL foregrip+compensator+scope cause of idiotic meta.
Last edited by Favkis Nexerade; Aug 6, 2019 @ 9:13am
Festung1946 Aug 6, 2019 @ 9:59am 
Originally posted by Favkis Nexerade:
Female on preview have akm.

It's clearly an ak-47 look at the cover of the receiver.

Devs should add side specific weapons not everything for everyone.
Favkis Nexerade Aug 6, 2019 @ 10:02am 
Originally posted by LandKampfJäger:
Originally posted by Favkis Nexerade:
Female on preview have akm.

It's clearly an ak-47 look at the cover of the receiver.

Devs should add side specific weapons not everything for everyone.
yeah it's ak you're right

Well they're adding everything to everyone. 2x MP5, 2x .50 AMRs, 2x Galils coming, 2x M16A2/A4 etc etc, so I see no reason not to add AK74M or something to security.
Lazo Aug 6, 2019 @ 10:04am 
Originally posted by LandKampfJäger:
It's clearly an ak-47 look at the cover of the receiver.

Please, do explain how you can tell an ak-47 and an akm apart by the cover of the receiver.
AgentHotel Aug 6, 2019 @ 10:10am 
Originally posted by Laz0:
Originally posted by LandKampfJäger:
It's clearly an ak-47 look at the cover of the receiver.

Please, do explain how you can tell an ak-47 and an akm apart by the cover of the receiver.

AKM has slanted muzzle brake, while AK-47 doesn't.
Lazo Aug 6, 2019 @ 10:13am 
Originally posted by AgentHotel:
AKM has slanted muzzle brake, while AK-47 doesn't.

I am aware, I just want to know how the guy clearly distinguishes the two by the receiver cover.
HeroicHeathen Aug 6, 2019 @ 10:36am 
Originally posted by Sam Fisher:
I would suggest giving another team the opportunity to take the ak-74, as I know people from the regular army have access to these weapons, and they use it widely. Take the woman for the preview of the game, she had the Ak-74, and I think it will be widely used in the same way as the rebels.

There is no regular army in this game though, they are PMCs!!!!




Originally posted by hit em up:
I think Security would be better with an AK-12, since it's an actual modernized military firearm

also, the woman in the preview is a kurdish freedom fighter, she was supposed to star in the campaign, which got cancelled for various reasons

Indeed, a military firearm, no military in this game, again...they are PMCs!!



That aside, they should have access to AKM,AK47,AK74..the whole table!! They are PMCs not military, I cant stress that often enough.

Festung1946 Aug 6, 2019 @ 10:48am 
Originally posted by Laz0:
Originally posted by LandKampfJäger:
It's clearly an ak-47 look at the cover of the receiver.

Please, do explain how you can tell an ak-47 and an akm apart by the cover of the receiver.

The picture is quite loosely painted. But it is more likely be 47 than akm (I guess you can find images of both guns). At the same time muzzle brake can be removed and cover changed. Plus, 47s and type 56s are more preeminent in the midle east than any other ak rifles.
Recluse Aug 6, 2019 @ 10:52am 
Originally posted by Garadros:
Originally posted by Sam Fisher:
I would suggest giving another team the opportunity to take the ak-74, as I know people from the regular army have access to these weapons, and they use it widely. Take the woman for the preview of the game, she had the Ak-74, and I think it will be widely used in the same way as the rebels.

There is no regular army in this game though, they are PMCs!!!!




Originally posted by hit em up:
I think Security would be better with an AK-12, since it's an actual modernized military firearm

also, the woman in the preview is a kurdish freedom fighter, she was supposed to star in the campaign, which got cancelled for various reasons

Indeed, a military firearm, no military in this game, again...they are PMCs!!



That aside, they should have access to AKM,AK47,AK74..the whole table!! They are PMCs not military, I cant stress that often enough.

They aren't PMCs, they're more like the Afghan National Security Forces, they're local armies and law enforcement basically. Maybe throw in the ISAF advisors on there.
HeroicHeathen Aug 6, 2019 @ 10:55am 
Originally posted by Recluse:
Originally posted by Garadros:

There is no regular army in this game though, they are PMCs!!!!






Indeed, a military firearm, no military in this game, again...they are PMCs!!



That aside, they should have access to AKM,AK47,AK74..the whole table!! They are PMCs not military, I cant stress that often enough.

They aren't PMCs, they're more like the Afghan National Security Forces, they're local armies and law enforcement basically. Maybe throw in the ISAF advisors on there.

Do you have any sources for that ?

The ingame title says " Security Forces " and to me this is pretty obvious especially because they are using first world equipment that is not used by the Afghan National Army.

The second hint is women, they are obviously trying to represent Kurdish fighters, there arent any women fighting in Afghanistan.

Your statement is not thought through very well. They are PMCs and there are many things indicating that, including the first Insurgency title.

Recluse Aug 6, 2019 @ 11:00am 
Originally posted by Garadros:
Originally posted by Recluse:

They aren't PMCs, they're more like the Afghan National Security Forces, they're local armies and law enforcement basically. Maybe throw in the ISAF advisors on there.

Do you have any sources for that ?

The ingame title says " Security Forces " and to me this is pretty obvious especially because they are using first world equipment that is not used by the Afghan National Army.

The second hint is women, they are obviously trying to represent Kurdish fighters, there arent any women fighting in Afghanistan.

Your statement is not thought through very well. They are PMCs and there are many things indicating that, including the first Insurgency title.

They aren't PMCs dude. PMCs are not allowed by international law to operate on the offensive like this. How are you going to tell me I didn't think this out? They are "Security Forces" not mercenaries. I didn't say they were the Afghan National Army, but they are like it. They're fictional local secuirty forces and a bit of liberty is taken for gameplay's sake.
RetroRonin Aug 6, 2019 @ 1:47pm 
An RK-95 would be better. That's basically a finland ak anyway. Here's a picture of U.S Marine using it. We could use some more Darude guns:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RK_95_TP#/media/File:Marines_and_Finnish_forces_train_in_sub-zero_conditions_141015-M-DP395-002.jpg
< >
Showing 1-15 of 36 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Aug 5, 2019 @ 5:59am
Posts: 36